The Deseado Formation of PatagoniaLoomis, Frederic Brewster
Science
The Deseado Formation of Patagonia
Loomis, Frederic Brewster
Paleontology -- Patagonia (Argentina and Chile)
Referring back to the foregoing table. The development of tushes may be
an adaptive character; but in the elephants it is inc. 2 of the upper
and inc. 2 of the lower jaw which are so developed. In _Pyrotherium_,
in the upper dentition, it is also inc. 2 which makes the tush, and
inc. 1 is enlarged as in _Moeritherium_, and, so far as we know, has
not been reduced in later forms as it was in the elephant line. In the
lower jaw we have no final evidence which will show whether it is inc.
1 or inc. 2 which makes the tush; but the lower tush bites against
upper inc. 2 and I have considered it to be incisor 2.
The loss of the teeth behind the tushes is a character to be expected
in the development of tushes and gives no data. The bilophodont
character of the back teeth has occurred many times in the animal
kingdom and while it may be the inheritance of the early elephants it
can not be used as an argument.
The position of the nasal opening looks very much like that of
elephants, but again is coincident with the development of a proboscis.
However, this has not occurred a great number of times in the animal
kingdom, and where it has, it takes a variety of forms of modification.
In _Pyrotherium_, the modification is of the type in elephants, and
elephants only.
A very striking feature is the development of the dental region
downward so that the basicranial axis is bent upward, making an angle
of about 140 degrees. There are other cases of the bending of the
basicranial axis; but in the other ungulates it is a bend downward,
the reverse of what we find here and in elephants. To adjust the
posterior part of the nasal chamber to this, the pterygoids and the
alisphenoids are developed into great wing-like plates on either side.
I find this modification of the basicranial axis and of the palatal,
pterygoid and alisphenoid bones in no other group but the elephants. In
_Palaeomastodon_ it has been developed to a degree so that the angle is
about 155 degrees.
The back of the palatine bones is also characteristic, for these begin
as narrow pointed bones and behind the last molar expand into wide
plates, just as in _Palaeomastodon_ (and in no other groups), having
the postpalatine foramen opposite or behind the last molar.
The post-tympanic region of the squamosum is modified so that this
process unites with the anterior squamosal region to crowd out more or
less completely the tympanic bone where it should surround the auditory
meatus. This feature is common to the elephants, the hyracoids, and the
toxodonts, so that I consider it a primitive feature indicative of the
ultimate common ancestry of these groups. The tympanic bulla can be
compared with that of elephants closely, and has much in common with
that of toxodonts, but in this last group the tympanic is much more
highly developed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account