The development of armor-piercing shells (with suggestions for their improvement)De Zafra, Carlos
History
The development of armor-piercing shells (with suggestions for their improvement)
De Zafra, Carlos
Projectiles
-------------+-----------+-------------+-----------
Wt. of shell| Calibre of| Thickness of| Striking
capped | gun | plates | velocity
Pounds | Inches | Inches |Ft.-seconds
-------------+-----------+-------------+-----------
105 | 6 | 5 | 1,451
105 | 6 | 6 | 1,648
105 | 6 | 7 | 1,836
165 | 7 | 6 | 1,464
165 | 7 | 7 | 1,631
165 | 7 | 8 | 1,791
260 | 8 | 7 | 1,459
260 | 8 | 8 | 1,603
260 | 8 | 9 | 1,741
510 | 10 | 9 | 1,458
510 | 10 | 10 | 1,568
510 | 10 | 11 | 1,676
870 | 12 | 11 | 1,424
870 | 12 | 12 | 1,514
-------------+-----------+-------------+-----------
The first impact shall be located near the central portion of the
plate, and the other two impacts shall be located as directed by the
Bureau; no impact, however, to be nearer another impact or an edge of
the plate than 3-1/2 calibres of the projectile used.
On these three impacts no projectile or fragment thereof shall get
entirely through the plate and backing, nor shall any through crack
develop to an edge of the plate or to another impact.
* * * * *
From the above it is seen that a manufacturer supplying both
armor-plate and shell to the Government is called upon to produce a
shell with sufficient integrity to completely penetrate, and without
breaking up, his armor-plate of sufficient thickness to resist that
shell.
The capping of projectiles consists in placing over the point a cone or
mass of metal of comparative softness. In the United States services
soft steel is used for the purpose. Authorities disagree as to the
exact function which the cap plays, some claiming it to act as a
lubricating metal facilitating the passage of the projectile, others
claim that it gives an initial shock to the armor-plate before the
shell proper has struck it, which latter then strikes the plate in a
state of molecular unrest, and, therefore, of impaired resisting power.
Firing tests of shell at armor-plate at oblique angles have proven the
capped shell superior, which would indicate that the cap in this
instance at any rate is capable of securing a hold on the plate which
the bare point of the shell cannot, in so much as uncapped shells
glance off. At any rate capped projectiles are, on the whole, superior
to the uncapped and the practice of capping is recommended as an
additional advantage when used in conjunction with the improvements
here-in-after described.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account