The development of British landscape painting in water-colours — John Shaqi
The development of British landscape painting in water-coloursFinberg, A. J. (Alexander Joseph)
History
The development of British landscape painting in water-colours
Finberg, A. J. (Alexander Joseph)
Landscape painting, British; Watercolor painting, British
[Born at Norwich, May 16, 1782; went to London, 1798; gained prize for a
drawing from the Society of Arts, 1800; returned to Norwich, 1806, and
opened a school for drawing and design; married, 1809; published a
series of etchings, 1811, and became president of the Norwich Society of
Artists; published “Norman and Gothic Architecture,” 1817, and
“Architectural Antiquities of Normandy,” 1822; Associate, Society of
Painters in Water-Colours, 1825; appointed Professor of Drawing at
King’s College, London, 1834, mainly through Turner’s influence;
published his “Liber Studiorum,” 1838; died July 24, 1842.
EXHIBITED: Royal Academy, 1800-’06; Associated Artists, 1810, ’11;
Society of Painters in Water-Colours, 1825, ’26, ’28-’39; Society
of British Artists, 1838; Norwich Society of Artists, 1807-’12,
’15, ’18, ’20, ’21, ’23, ’24; Norfolk and Suffolk Institution,
1828-’33.
WORKS IN PUBLIC GALLERIES: National Gallery (an oil-painting); V.
and A. Museum (Water-Colours); British Museum; National Galleries
of Scotland and Ireland; Norwich Castle Museum; Manchester
Whitworth Institute, etc.
BIOGRAPHICAL AND CRITICAL SOURCES: Memoir in catalogue of Norwich
Art Circle’s exhibition of Cotman’s works, July 1888; Laurence
Binyon’s “Crome and Cotman” (Portfolio Monograph), 1897, and
“Cotman” in “Masters of English Landscape Painting” (THE STUDIO
Summer Number, 1903).
REPRODUCTIONS: The three works cited above, and histories of
British water-colour painting by Monkhouse, Finberg, etc., already
cited.]
Cotman is the greatest of all the English water-colour painters born
after Turner. He is the only one of them whose works can be put beside
Turner’s and judged on a footing of equality. When we compare Prout,
Cox, De Wint, and even Bonington, with Turner we feel that they must be
judged by some less exacting standard than that which we apply to
Turner. This is not the case with Cotman. He had not the width and
range, the abundance and all-conquering power of Turner, but within his
own limits he is every whit as unapproachable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account