can be predicated"[52:2] is not an essential factor in its notion. The
collection of things we call the Universe, is externalised or
perceptible reality which could, so to speak, exist independent of all
perceptibility. The object of these metaphysical subtleties is purely
theological. God, to the Rationalist, is an absolute unity which can, in
no sense, admit of plurality, and could thus exist without the
perceptible plurality--the Universe.
[51:1] Steiner: Die Mu‘taziliten; Leipzig, 1865, p. 57.
[51:2] Steiner: Die Mu‘taziliten; Leipzig, 1865, p. 59.
[51:3] S̱ẖahrastānī: Cureton's ed., p. 38.
[51:4] Ibn Ḥazm (ed. Cairo): Vol. V, p. 42.
[52:1] S̱ẖahrastānī: Cureton's ed, p. 38.
[52:2] Steiner: Die Mu‘taziliten, p. 80.
The activity of God, then, consists only in making the atom perceptible.
The properties of the atom flow from its own nature. A stone thrown up
falls down on account of its own indwelling property[53:1]. God, says
Al-‘Aṭṭār of Baṣra and Bis̱ẖr ibn al Mu‘tamir, did not create colour,
length, breadth, taste or smell--all these are activities of bodies
themselves[53:2]. Even the number of things in the Universe is not known
to God[53:3]. Bishr ibn al-Mu‘tamir further explained the properties of
bodies by what he called "Tawallud"--interaction of bodies[53:4]. Thus
it is clear that the Rationalists were philosophically materialists, and
theologically deists.
[53:1] S̱ẖahrastānī: Cureton's ed., p. 38.
[53:2] Ibn Ḥazm (ed. Cairo): Vol. IV, pp. 194, 197.
[53:3] Ibn Ḥazm (ed. Cairo): Vol. IV, p. 194.
[53:4] S̱ẖahrastānī: Cureton's ed., p. 44.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account