If this failure to establish a proper object-relation persists and is
not alleviated, all future objects are perceived as extensions of the
Primary Object (the self), or the objects of a merger with one's self,
because they are perceived narcissistically.
There are, therefore, two modes of object perception:
The narcissistic (all objects are perceived as variations of the
perceiving self) and the social (all objects are perceived as others or
self-objects).
As we said earlier, the core (narcissistic) self - precedes language or
interaction with others. As the core self matures it can develop either
into a True Self OR into a False Self. The two are mutually exclusive
(a person with False Self has no functioning True Self). The
distinction of the False Self is that it perceives others
narcissistically. As opposed to it, the True Self perceives others
socially.
The child constantly compares his first experience with an object (his
internalised PO) to his experience with his SO. The internalisations of
both the PO and the SO are modified as a result of this process of
comparison. The SO is idealised and internalised to form what I call
the SEGO (loosely, the equivalent of Freud's Superego plus the
internalised outcomes of social interactions throughout life). The
internalised PO is constantly modified to be rendered compatible with
input by the SO (for example: "You are loved", or "You are a bad boy").
This is the process by which the Ideal Ego is created.
The internalisations of the PO, of the SO and of the outcomes of their
interactions (for instance, of the results of the aforementioned
constant comparison between them) form what Bowlby calls "working
models". These are constantly updated representations of both the self
and of Meaningful Others (what I call Auxiliary Others). The
narcissist's working models are defective. They pertain to his self and
to ALL others. To the narcissist, ALL others are meaningful because NO
ONE has BEEN meaningful hitherto. This forces him to resort to crude
abstractions (imagine the sheer number of working models needed).
He is forced to dehumanise, objectify, generalise, idealise, devalue,
or stereotypise in order to cope with the sheer volume of potential
interactions with meaningful objects. In his defence against being
overwhelmed, he feels so superior, so inflated - because he is the only
REAL three-dimensional character in his life.
Moreover, the narcissist's working models are rigid and never updated
because he does not feel that he is interacting with real objects. How
can one feel empathic, for instance, towards a representation or an
abstraction or an object of gratification?
A matrix of possible axes of interaction between child and mother can
be constructed.
The first term in each of these equations of interaction describes the
child, the second the mother.
The Mother can be:
* Accepting ("good enough");
* Domineering;
* Doting/Smothering;
* Indifferent;
* Rejecting;
* Abusive.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account