The diagnostics and treatment of tropical diseasesStitt, E. R. (Edward Rhodes)
Science
The diagnostics and treatment of tropical diseases
Stitt, E. R. (Edward Rhodes)
Tropical medicine
_Clinical Diagnosis._—Cases of kala-azar are usually diagnosed as
malaria and it is in the lack of response to quinine that we have our
best point of differentiation.
In children showing splenomegaly the probability of the case being
kala-azar rather than malaria is indicated if the case has shown
progressive deterioration of health.
Malta fever shows a rather similar succession of febrile and
afebrile periods but the spleen of the former rarely shows marked
enlargement and the bronchial catarrh, sweatings, transient joint
swellings and neuralgic manifestations are characteristic of Malta
fever. Kala-azar may show muscular pains and slight sweatings and
the differentiation has at times only been made by the laboratory
diagnosis.
Typhoid and the paratyphoids are best differentiated clinically by
the presence of a continued fever, the absence of a double daily
rise and the existence of a more marked apathy.
The recent statements that hookworm disease may show enlargement of
the spleen would make this a condition to differentiate. Hookworm
ova and an eosinophilia indicate ancylostomiasis but there is
always the question here as with malaria as to the existence of
kala-azar and some other affection.
_Laboratory Diagnosis._—The leukemias can be easily differentiated
by the blood picture, an important matter because the spleen of
spleno-myelogenous leukemia is very friable and the danger from
splenic puncture is far greater in this condition than in kala-azar.
Banti’s disease with its leucopenia shows a rather similar blood
picture and can only be surely differentiated by the finding of
leishman bodies in kala-azar.
While malaria may at times show a leucopenia below 4000, a
polynuclear percentage below 50 and a large mononuclear one of 20
or more, yet the simultaneous appearance of all three is rare in
malaria while common in kala-azar.
Malta fever, typhoid and the paratyphoids are best differentiated
by blood cultures or agglutination tests.
Until recently it was recommended that for diagnosis our best
procedure was to make a splenic puncture. Manson and others have
pointed out the dangers from splenic puncture in kala-azar and have
rather preferred puncture of the liver, although recognizing that
the chances of obtaining parasites from a liver puncture, are less
than from a splenic one.
Statistics have been given where a mortality approximating 1% has
followed spleen puncture. Bousfield, however, using an all-glass
syringe with a 1½ inch needle did not have a fatality in 120 spleen
punctures.
For diagnosis the spleen or liver juice, rather than pure blood, is
smeared on a slide and stained by some Romanowsky method, preferably
that of Giemsa.
Cultures on N. N. N. medium can also be made.
Human blood seems to inhibit growth so that N. N. N. medium for
cultivating _Leishmania_ should be made from rabbit blood.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account