The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductionsPlato
PhilosophyPhilosophy
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato
Dialogues, Greek -- Translations into English; Philosophy, Ancient
5. Again, believing in the immortality of the soul, we must still ask the
question of Socrates, ‘What is that which we suppose to be immortal?’
Is it the personal and individual element in us, or the spiritual and
universal? Is it the principle of knowledge or of goodness, or the union
of the two? Is it the mere force of life which is determined to be, or
the consciousness of self which cannot be got rid of, or the fire of
genius which refuses to be extinguished? Or is there a hidden being
which is allied to the Author of all existence, who is because he is
perfect, and to whom our ideas of perfection give us a title to belong?
Whatever answer is given by us to these questions, there still remains
the necessity of allowing the permanence of evil, if not for ever, at
any rate for a time, in order that the wicked ‘may not have too good a
bargain.’ For the annihilation of evil at death, or the eternal duration
of it, seem to involve equal difficulties in the moral government of
the universe. Sometimes we are led by our feelings, rather than by our
reason, to think of the good and wise only as existing in another life.
Why should the mean, the weak, the idiot, the infant, the herd of men
who have never in any proper sense the use of reason, reappear with
blinking eyes in the light of another world? But our second thought is
that the hope of humanity is a common one, and that all or none will be
partakers of immortality. Reason does not allow us to suppose that we
have any greater claims than others, and experience may often reveal
to us unexpected flashes of the higher nature in those whom we had
despised. Why should the wicked suffer any more than ourselves? had we
been placed in their circumstances should we have been any better than
they? The worst of men are objects of pity rather than of anger to the
philanthropist; must they not be equally such to divine benevolence?
Even more than the good they have need of another life; not that they
may be punished, but that they may be educated. These are a few of the
reflections which arise in our minds when we attempt to assign any form
to our conceptions of a future state.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account