The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductionsPlato
PhilosophyPhilosophy
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato
Dialogues, Greek -- Translations into English; Philosophy, Ancient
There are some other questions which are disturbing to us because we
have no answer to them. What is to become of the animals in a future
state? Have we not seen dogs more faithful and intelligent than men,
and men who are more stupid and brutal than any animals? Does their
life cease at death, or is there some ‘better thing reserved’ also for
them? They may be said to have a shadow or imitation of morality, and
imperfect moral claims upon the benevolence of man and upon the justice
of God. We cannot think of the least or lowest of them, the insect, the
bird, the inhabitants of the sea or the desert, as having any place
in a future world, and if not all, why should those who are specially
attached to man be deemed worthy of any exceptional privilege? When we
reason about such a subject, almost at once we degenerate into nonsense.
It is a passing thought which has no real hold on the mind. We may argue
for the existence of animals in a future state from the attributes of
God, or from texts of Scripture (‘Are not two sparrows sold for one
farthing?’ &c.), but the truth is that we are only filling up the void
of another world with our own fancies. Again, we often talk about the
origin of evil, that great bugbear of theologians, by which they frighten
us into believing any superstition. What answer can be made to the old
commonplace, ‘Is not God the author of evil, if he knowingly permitted,
but could have prevented it?’ Even if we assume that the inequalities of
this life are rectified by some transposition of human beings in another,
still the existence of the very least evil if it could have been avoided,
seems to be at variance with the love and justice of God. And so we
arrive at the conclusion that we are carrying logic too far, and that
the attempt to frame the world according to a rule of divine perfection
is opposed to experience and had better be given up. The case of the
animals is our own. We must admit that the Divine Being, although perfect
himself, has placed us in a state of life in which we may work together
with him for good, but we are very far from having attained to it.
[Sidenote: _The immortality of the soul._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account