The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductionsPlato
PhilosophyPhilosophy
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato
Dialogues, Greek -- Translations into English; Philosophy, Ancient
_Soc._ They spoke of a glorious truth, as I conceive.
_Men._ What was it? and who were they?
[Sidenote: The ancient poets tell us that the soul of man is immortal and
has a recollection of all that she has ever known in former states of
being.]
_Soc._ Some of them were priests and priestesses, who had
studied how they might be able to give a reason of their
profession: there have been poets also, who spoke of these
things by inspiration, like Pindar, and many others who were
inspired. And they say—mark, now, and see whether their
words are true—they say that the soul of man is immortal,
and at one time has an end, which is termed dying, and
at another time is born again, but is never destroyed. And
the moral is, that a man ought to live always in perfect holiness.
‘_For in the ninth year Persephone sends the souls of
those from whom she has received the penalty of ancient crime
back again from beneath into the light of the sun above, and
these are they who become noble kings and mighty men and great
in wisdom and are called saintly heroes in after ages[6]._’ The
soul, then, as being immortal, and having been born again
many times, and having seen all things that exist, whether
in this world or in the world below, has knowledge of them
all; and it is no wonder that she should be able to call to
remembrance all that she ever knew about virtue, and about
everything; for as all nature is akin, and the soul has learned
all things, there is no difficulty in her eliciting or as men say
learning, out of a single recollection all the rest, if a man is
strenuous and does not faint; for all enquiry and all learning
is but recollection. And therefore we ought not to listen
to this sophistical argument about the impossibility of enquiry:
for it will make us idle, and is sweet only to the
sluggard; but the other saying will make us active and inquisitive.
In that confiding, I will gladly enquire with you
into the nature of virtue.
[Sidenote: _The crucial experiment._]
_Men._ Yes, Socrates; but what do you mean by saying that
we do not learn, and that what we call learning is only a process
of recollection? Can you teach me how this is?
_Soc._ I told you, Meno, just now that you were a rogue, and
now you ask whether I can teach you, when I am saying that
there is no teaching, but only recollection; and thus you 82
imagine that you will involve me in a contradiction.
_Men._ Indeed, Socrates, I protest that I had no such intention.
I only asked the question from habit; but if you can prove
to me that what you say is true, I wish that you would.
[Sidenote: A Greek slave is introduced, from whom certain mathematical
conclusions which he has never learned are elicited by Socrates.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account