The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductionsPlato
PhilosophyPhilosophy
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato
Dialogues, Greek -- Translations into English; Philosophy, Ancient
_Soc._ And a thing is not seen because it is visible, but conversely,
visible because it is seen; nor is a thing led because
it is in the state of being led, or carried because it is in the
state of being carried, but the converse of this. And now I
think, Euthyphro, that my meaning will be intelligible; and
my meaning is, that any state of action or passion implies
previous action or passion. It does not become because it is
becoming, but it is in a state of becoming because it becomes;
neither does it suffer because it is in a state of suffering, but
it is in a state of suffering because it suffers. Do you not
agree?
_Euth._ Yes.
_Soc._ Is not that which is loved in some state either of
becoming or suffering?
_Euth._ Yes.
[Sidenote: The latter is the truer account, and therefore we can only say
that what is loved by all the gods is in a state to be loved by them; but
holiness has a wider meaning than this.]
_Soc._ And the same holds as in the previous instances; the
state of being loved follows the act of being loved, and not the
act the state.
_Euth._ Certainly.
_Soc._ And what do you say of piety, Euthyphro: is not
piety, according to your definition, loved by all the gods?
_Euth._ Yes.
_Soc._ Because it is pious or holy, or for some other reason?
_Euth._ No, that is the reason.
_Soc._ It is loved because it is holy, not holy because it is
loved?
_Euth._ Yes.
_Soc._ And that which is dear to the gods is loved by them,
and is in a state to be loved of them because it is loved of
them?
[Sidenote: _The essence and the attribute._]
_Euth._ Certainly.
_Soc._ Then that which is dear to the gods, Euthyphro, is
not holy, nor is that which is holy loved of God, as you
affirm; but they are two different things.
_Euth._ How do you mean, Socrates?
_Soc._ I mean to say that the holy has been acknowledged
by us to be loved of God because it is holy, not to be holy
because it is loved.
_Euth._ Yes.
_Soc._ But that which is dear to the gods is dear to them
because it is loved by them, not loved by them because it is
dear to them.
_Euth._ True.
[Sidenote: What is the essential meaning of holiness or piety?]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account