The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductionsPlato
PhilosophyPhilosophy
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato
Dialogues, Greek -- Translations into English; Philosophy, Ancient
The second accusation he meets by interrogating Meletus, who
is present and can be interrogated. ‘If he is the corrupter, who
is the improver of the citizens?’ (Cp. Meno 91 C.) ‘All men
everywhere.’ But how absurd, how contrary to analogy is this! 25
How inconceivable too, that he should make the citizens worse
when he has to live with them. This surely cannot be intentional;
and if unintentional, he ought to have been instructed by Meletus, 26
and not accused in the court.
But there is another part of the indictment which says that he
teaches men not to receive the gods whom the city receives, and
has other new gods. ‘Is that the way in which he is supposed to
corrupt the youth?’ ‘Yes, it is.’ ‘Has he only new gods, or none
at all? ‘None at all.’ ‘What, not even the sun and moon?’
‘No; why, he says that the sun is a stone, and the moon earth.’
That, replies Socrates, is the old confusion about Anaxagoras;
the Athenian people are not so ignorant as to attribute to the
influence of Socrates notions which have found their way into the
drama, and may be learned at the theatre. Socrates undertakes
to show that Meletus (rather unjustifiably) has been compounding 27
a riddle in this part of the indictment: ‘There are no gods, but
Socrates believes in the existence of the sons of gods, which is
absurd.’
Leaving Meletus, who has had enough words spent upon him, 28
he returns to the original accusation. The question may be
asked, Why will he persist in following a profession which leads
him to death? Why?—because he must remain at his post where
the god has placed him, as he remained at Potidaea, and Amphipolis,
and Delium, where the generals placed him. Besides, he is 29
not so overwise as to imagine that he knows whether death is
a good or an evil; and he is certain that desertion of his duty
is an evil. Anytus is quite right in saying that they should never 30
have indicted him if they meant to let him go. For he will certainly
obey God rather than man; and will continue to preach to
all men of all ages the necessity of virtue and improvement; and
if they refuse to listen to him he will still persevere and reprove
them. This is his way of corrupting the youth, which he will not
cease to follow in obedience to the god, even if a thousand deaths
await him.
[Sidenote: _Analysis 30-35._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account