The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductionsPlato
PhilosophyPhilosophy
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato
Dialogues, Greek -- Translations into English; Philosophy, Ancient
He is desirous that they should let him live—not for his own
sake, but for theirs; because he is their heaven-sent friend (and 31
they will never have such another), or, as he may be ludicrously
described, he is the gadfly who stirs the generous steed into
motion. Why then has he never taken part in public affairs?
Because the familiar divine voice has hindered him; if he had
been a public man, and had fought for the right, as he would
certainly have fought against the many, he would not have lived,
and could therefore have done no good. Twice in public matters 32
he has risked his life for the sake of justice—once at the trial
of the generals; and again in resistance to the tyrannical commands
of the Thirty.
But, though not a public man, he has passed his days in instructing
the citizens without fee or reward—this was his mission.
Whether his disciples have turned out well or ill, he cannot justly
be charged with the result, for he never promised to teach them 33
anything. They might come if they liked, and they might stay
away if they liked: and they did come, because they found an
amusement in hearing the pretenders to wisdom detected. If
they have been corrupted, their elder relatives (if not themselves)
might surely come into court and witness against him, and there
is an opportunity still for them to appear. But their fathers 34
and brothers all appear in court (including ‘this’ Plato), to
witness on his behalf; and if their relatives are corrupted,
at least they are uncorrupted; ‘and they are my witnesses.
For they know that I am speaking the truth, and that Meletus
is lying.’
This is about all that he has to say. He will not entreat the
judges to spare his life; neither will he present a spectacle of
weeping children, although he, too, is not made of ‘rock or oak.’ 35
Some of the judges themselves may have complied with this
practice on similar occasions, and he trusts that they will not be
angry with him for not following their example. But he feels
that such conduct brings discredit on the name of Athens: he
feels, too, that the judge has sworn not to give away justice; and
he cannot be guilty of the impiety of asking the judge to break his
oath, when he is himself being tried for impiety.
[Sidenote: _Analysis 36-41._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account