The Diamond Sutra (Chin-Kang-Ching) or Prajna-ParamitaUnknown
Religion
The Diamond Sutra (Chin-Kang-Ching) or Prajna-Paramita
Unknown
Buddhism; Buddhism -- Sacred books
[5] “The praises of the _Bana_ (Law) are a favourite subject with
the native authors.... The discourses of Buddha are as a divine
charm to cure the poison of evil desire; a divine medicine to heal
the disease of anger; a lamp in the midst of the darkness of
ignorance; a fire, like that which burns at the end of a Kalpa, to
destroy the evils of repeated existence; a meridian sun to dry up
the mud of covetousness; a great rain to quench the flame of
sensuality; a thicket to block up the road that leads to the
_Narakas_ (place of the wicked); a ship in which to sail to the
opposite shore of the ocean of existence; a collyrium for taking
away the eye-film of heresy; a moon to bring out the night-blowing
lotus of merit; a succession of trees bearing immortal fruit,
placed here and there, by which the traveller may be enabled to
cross the desert of existence; ... a straight highway by which to
pass to the incomparable wisdom; a door of entrance to the eternal
city of Nirvana; ... a treasury of the best things it is possible to
obtain; and a power by which may be appeased the sorrow of every
sentient being.”—_Eastern Monachism_. Spence Hardy.
[Chapter 13]
Upon that occasion, Subhuti enquired of the Lord Buddha, saying:
“Honoured of the Worlds! by what name shall this Scripture be known,
that we may regard it with reverence?” The Lord Buddha replied,
saying: “Subhuti, this Scripture shall be known as _The Diamond
Sutra_,[1] ‘The Transcendent Wisdom,’ by means of which we reach ‘The
Other Shore.’ By this name you shall reverently regard it! And why?
Subhuti, what the Lord Buddha declared as ‘transcendent wisdom’ by
means of which we reach ‘the other shore,’ is not essentially
‘transcendent wisdom’—in its essence it transcends all wisdom.”
The Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying:[2] “What think you? Did the
Lord Buddha formulate a precise system of Law or doctrine?” Subhuti
replied, saying: “Honoured of the Worlds! The Lord Buddha did not
formulate a precise system of Law or doctrine.”
The Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying: “What think you? within the
myriad worlds which comprise this universe, are the atoms of dust
numerous?”[3] Subhuti replied, saying: “Very numerous, Honoured of the
Worlds!”
The Lord Buddha continuing his discourse, said: “Subhuti, the Lord
Buddha declares that all these ‘atoms of dust’ are not essentially
‘atoms of dust,’ they are merely termed ‘atoms of dust.’ The Lord
Buddha also declares that those ‘myriad worlds’ are not really ‘myriad
worlds,’ they are merely designated ‘myriad worlds.’”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account