The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 02
History
The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 02
United States -- Foreign relations -- 1775-1783; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Sources
If anything could astonish me, that comes from Mr Deane, surely
here is abundant matter for astonishment. He had just before, from
under his own hand, on the very same paper, acknowledged my having
attempted to exercise that appointment, in the joint letter from
Mr Thomas Morris and myself as commercial agents to himself and Dr
Franklin, in August, 1777, which he calls _severe_, but which I aver
is a very civil one, and that it does not contain a single harsh
or offensive expression. He acknowledges, also, the conference I
had with all the Commissioners in France in October, on the subject
of the commercial business, when Mr Izard was present. He knew,
also, that I had received a cargo publicly at Nantes, belonging to
Congress, by the Abigail, Captain Jenne, which vessel was loaded
again by me, and despatched back for America in three weeks, while
other American vessels, of no greater size or importance, were
detained at Nantes from two to three months. He knew, also, or
ought to have known, that I had written a letter addressed to all
the Commissioners, Dr Franklin, Mr Deane, and Mr Arthur Lee, on
the 10th of November, 1777, which was delivered to Dr Franklin as
eldest Commissioner the same day, wherein I requested a copy of the
treaties, that had been proposed to the Courts of France and Spain,
agreeably to my instructions from Congress, that I might not, as a
Commissioner of Congress, propose anything repugnant thereto to the
Courts of Vienna and Berlin. After these things, and a continued
series of operations in the public service, (all of which Mr Deane
was acquainted with) from the time I was permitted to act by himself
and Dr Franklin, until the 4th of December, when the news of General
Burgoyne’s defeat arrived at Paris, with what face could Mr Deane
make such an assertion as he has done? Most of these things also
being of public notoriety, and capable of being proved by a multitude
of witnesses, can any one suppose Mr Deane so totally ignorant of
the laws of England, as to imagine he could think I might return “to
the exercise of my Aldermanship in London,” without being a madman
desirous of hanging myself?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account