The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 02
History
The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 02
United States -- Foreign relations -- 1775-1783; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Sources
This gentleman attempts to excuse himself and Dr Franklin, for
not answering the joint letter of Mr Morris and myself to them,
by laying the blame on Mr Arthur Lee, not a syllable of which was
mentioned at the conference I had in October, 1777, at Passy with
the Commissioners, when Mr Izard was present, and which Mr Lee has
answered himself; but he omits to say why my several letters from
Nantes, as commercial agent on public business to the Commissioners,
were not answered, and of which I not only complained at the
conference but since. In order to invalidate what Mr Izard has
written, he totally mistakes the purport of the letter, in which Mr
Izard complains of Dr Franklin’s and Mr Deane’s refusing to write.
This letter, as desired by me, was a general one to all captains and
others, informing them that I was a Commercial Agent of the Secret
Committee of Congress, and that in consequence, they ought to follow
my directions and orders in all matters relative to the commercial
business of the Committee.
So far from my proposing the suspension of Mr Morris, I never thought
that the Commissioners had the least shadow of authority to do
it. It is certain, that Mr Deane not only proposed the suspension
of Mr Morris at this conference, but at several other times. As a
confirmation of this assertion, I beg leave to give the following
extract of Mr Deane’s letter to me, dated, “Passy, December 18th,
1777. My advice before your appointment (as was well known) was
to supersede Mr Morris, and appoint another until the pleasure of
Congress should be known; I was always of the same opinion after your
appointment, that you ought to conduct the business alone; these are
well known to have been my uniform sentiments.”
Mr Deane labors much to throw an odium on me, as wishing to
monopolise to myself the places both of honor and profit. Probably,
from the weakness of his memory he forgot, that in the commencement
of his address to the public, he states, that before September,
1776, he “had the honor to be the _Commercial_ and _Political_
Agent of America in Europe.” He also forgets, that the first cause
of any difference between us was his usurping the exercise of the
Commercial Agency, to which Mr Morris and myself were appointed by
the Secret Committee, while he was not only one of the Commissioners
to the Court of Versailles particularly, but generally authorised
to treat with every power in Europe; the influence and patronage of
which very expensive commission, he was perpetually endeavoring to
retain entirely to himself. He also seems to be ignorant of what I
suppose is known to most people in Philadelphia, that his “venerable
friend,” as he calls him, Dr Franklin, is at this moment not only
sole Minister Plenipotentiary to the Court of Versailles, but also in
fact sole superintending Commercial Agent in all Europe.
I have the honor to be, &c.
WILLIAM LEE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account