The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 10
History
The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 10
United States -- Foreign relations -- 1775-1783; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Sources
* * * * *
THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS TO THE COMMISSIONERS.
Philadelphia, June 16th, 1783.
Gentlemen,
I am sorry to inform you, that by the resignation of Mr Livingston as
Minister for Foreign Affairs, it has become necessary that you should
receive the resolutions of Congress, relative to your mission through
my hands. The disadvantage arising from this necessity, until a
successor to that worthy gentleman is appointed, will be yours, as it
is impossible for me to do more than barely to transmit the acts of
Congress necessary for your information.
Enclosed you have one of the 1st of May last, and another of the 12th
instant, which I hope will get safe to hand time enough for your
government. The commission and instructions referred to in the first,
not being ready, it was thought best to forward the resolution without
delay, that you might know what was intended in the present important
period of your negotiation. We have been much surprised, that we have
not received any communications from you since the cessation of
hostilities, except a letter of the 5th of April, from Mr Laurens.
I have the honor to be, &c.
ELIAS BOUDINOT, _President_.
* * * * *
HENRY LAURENS TO THE COMMISSIONERS.
London, June 17th, 1783.
Gentlemen,
I had the honor of addressing you on the 10th, immediately after my
landing at Dover. As early as possible after my arrival here, I
obtained an interview with Mr Secretary Fox, who was pleased to read
to me part of his latest despatches to Mr Hartley, which he supposed
would reach Paris on the 14th. It is probable, therefore, that before
this time, as much of the contents as is proper for your knowledge has
been communicated.
"Reciprocity," since the 10th of April, has undergone a certain degree
of refinement. The definition of that term appears now to be
possession of advantages on one side, and restrictions on the other.
"The navigation act is the vital of Great Britain, too delicate to
bear a touch." The sudden and unexpected, perhaps illicit, arrival of
ships and cargoes from America, may have caused this change of tone.
But you have heard in detail, and are more competent to judge.
From a desire of forming an opinion, I asked Mr Fox, whether he
thought I might venture for a few days, to take the benefit of Bath,
and yet be in time enough at Paris for the intended commercial
agreement? He replied, "I rather think you may." One need not be a
conjurer to draw an inference; you will either have finished the
business before I could travel to Paris, or without being missed there
I may go to Bath and repair my nerves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account