The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 11
History
The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 11
United States -- Foreign relations -- 1775-1783; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Sources
"ARTICLE II. _This separate peace cannot, however, be signed,
except conjointly, and at the same time with that of the powers
whose interests shall be treated by the mediating Courts. Although
neither peace, notwithstanding they are treated separately, shall
be concluded without the other, yet care shall be taken to inform
the mediators constantly of the progress of that, which regards
Great Britain and the Colonies, to the end, that the mediation may
be able to regulate the measures intrusted to it according to the
state of the negotiation relating to the Colonies, and both of the
pacifications, which shall have been separately concluded at the
same time, shall be solemnly guarantied by the mediating Courts,
and by every other neutral power, whose guarantee the belligerent
powers may think proper to claim._"
When the United States shall have been duly called to the Congress at
Vienna, and shall have commenced their separate negotiation with
England, this Article will make no difficulty with his Majesty.
"ARTICLE III. _To render the negotiations of peace independent of
events of war, always uncertain, which may arrest, or at least
retard their progress, there shall be a general armistice between
the two parties, during the term of one year, reckoning from ----
of the month of ---- of the present year, or reckoning from the
month of ---- of the year 1782. Should it happen, that a general
peace should not be re-established during the first term, or
whilst the duration of either of these terms continues, everything
shall remain in the same state, in which it shall be found at the
signing of these preliminaries._"
This Article includes two objects equally important; an armistice and
a _statu quo_. The mediators have already acknowledged, that without
this preliminary basis, they cannot enter upon a serious negotiation
for a peace; and, for still stronger reason, these preliminaries
should be established before a truce can be spoken of.
The two mediating Courts are themselves of this opinion, since they do
not propose the armistice, but in consequence of the acceptation of
the first and second Preliminary Articles. The King thinks, that
before they can agree to an armistice, it is necessary that the
belligerent parties should have established preliminaries; and it
cannot be denied, that the basis, which the high mediators have
proposed, may lead to a delay of those preliminaries, which should
serve as the pledge and security for the re-establishment of peace,
when, in fact, they really afford none.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account