I replaced these hypotheses successively by still others. I pleased
myself by saying that I was not in love, that the philosopher ruled the
lover, that myself, this dear self of whom I had constituted myself the
priest, remained superior and lucid. I branded as unworthy weaknesses
the reveries which at other times replaced these subtle calculations.
It was in the house that these reveries took hold upon me, when I
looked at the portraits of Charlotte which were scattered about
everywhere on the walls of the salon, on the tables and in Lucien’s
room. Photographs of all sizes represented her at six years, at ten
years, at fifteen, and I could trace the growth of her beauty from
the _mignonne_ grace of her first years to the delicate charm of
to-day.
The features of these photographs changed, but the expression never.
It was the same in the eyes of the child and in those of the young
girl, with something of seriousness, of tenderness and of fixedness
which revealed profound sensibility. It was impressed upon me, and the
remembrance of it agitates me with a confused emotion. Ah! Why did I
not give myself up to it entirely.
But why was Charlotte, in so many of these portraits by the side of her
brother André? What secret fibre of hate had this man, by his existence
alone, touched in my heart, that simply to see his image near that of
his sister dried up my tenderness and left in me only one wish?
I dared to formulate it, now that I believed I had taken this heart
in my snare. Yes, I wished to be Charlotte’s lover. And after? After?
I forced myself not to think of that, as I forced myself to destroy
the instinctive scruples of violated hospitality. I collected the
most masculine energies of my mind and I plunged more deeply into my
theories upon the cultivation of self.
I would go out of this experience enriched by emotions and
remembrances. Such would be the moral issue of the adventure. The
material issue would be the return to my mother’s house when my
preceptorate was ended.
When scruples became aroused, and a voice said: “And Charlotte? Have
you the right to treat her as a simple object of experience?” I took my
Spinoza, and I read there the theorem in which it is written that our
right is only limited by our power.
I took your “Theory of the Passions” and I studied there your phrases
on the duel between the sexes in love.
“It is the law of the world,” I reasoned, “that all existence should
be a conquest, executed and maintained by the strongest at the expense
of the feeblest. That is as true of the moral universe as of the
physical. There are some souls of prey as there are wolves, tigers and
hawks.”
This formula seemed to me strong, new and just. I applied it to myself,
and I repeated:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account