There were six or seven other persons. The savants companions were an
honest bourgeois and his wife, some shopkeepers of the neighborhood
who were very much out of their element. The sight of this person,
with his smoothly-shaven face, his eyes hidden behind the dark, round
glasses of his spectacles, with his long redingote and his inexplicable
physiognomy made these people so uneasy that they left the place where
they were whispering together:
“He is a detective,” whispered the husband to his wife.
“Do you think so?” asked the woman regarding the enigmatic and
immovable figure in terror. “_Dieu_! but he has a false look!”
While this profoundly comic scene was being acted, without the
professional observer of the human heart suspecting for a moment the
effect he was producing, nor even noticing that there was any one
beside him awaiting audience, the Judge of Instruction was talking with
a friend in a small room adjoining his office.
Adorned with the autographs and portraits of some famous criminals,
this apartment served M. Valette for toilet-room, smoking-room, and
also a place of retreat when he wished to chat out of the inevitable
presence of his clerk.
The judge was a man less than forty years of age, with a handsome
profile, clothes cut in the latest fashion and with rings on his
fingers, in fact, a magistrate of the new school. He held in his hand
the paper on which the savant had written his name in a clear, running
hand and passed it to his friend, a simple man of leisure, with one
of those physiognomies at once nervous and expressionless which are
only seen in Paris. Would you try to read their tastes, habits, or
character? It is impossible, so manifold and contradictory are the
sensations which have passed over the countenance. This _viveur_
was one of those men who are always present at first representations,
who visit painters’ studios, who attend sensational trials, and who
pride themselves on being _au courant_ with the affairs of the
day, “in the swim,” as they say to-day.
After reading the name of Adrien Sixte, he exclaimed:
“Well, old fellow, have you the chance of talking with that man! You
remember his chapter on love in some old book or other. Ah! he’s a
lascar who knows all about the women. But what the devil are you going
to question him about?”
“About this Greslon case,” replied the judge; “the young man has often
been to his house, and the defense has summoned him as witness for the
prisoner. A commission of examination has been issued, nothing more.”
“I wish I could see him,” said the other.
“Would it give you pleasure? Nothing easier. I am going to have him
called. You will go out as he comes in. Well, it is settled that we
will meet at Durand’s at eight o’clock, is it? Will Gladys be there?”
“Of course. Do you know Gladys’ latest?” We were reproaching Christine
in her presence for deceiving Jacques, when she said:
“But she must have two lovers, for she spends in one year twice what
each one gives her!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account