The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
1. _Moses_ in this Text doubtlesly did not set down all the particular
sorts of Divinations and Impostures used amongst the Heathen, for that
had hardly been possible, but the chiefest kinds of them. And this is
not rationally probable that he would do it by a Tautology, or
repetition of the same thing twice. For inquiring of the dead, or
consulting with them, was intended in the word _Ob_, and the Woman of
_Endor_ said; _Whom shall I raise up_, or cause to ascend unto thee?
Whereby it appeareth that she pretended (and also _Saul_ vainly
believed, who said; Divine unto me in or by _Ob_) that she could cause
the dead to ascend, and to have answers from them of things to come, as
is manifest in the Story of the pretended apparition and prediction of
_Samuel_. And so this thing should be twice repeated in this place,
which is not probable that _Moses_ would have done.
[Sidenote: Isai. 44. 19.]
2. He doth not forbid these several sorts of Divination only because
they were evil and unlawful in themselves (for some of them might be
lawful, and performed by natural or artificial means) but because of the
thing they all centred in, and the end they all tended to, which was to
lead and draw the people to inquire of and to serve deaf, dumb and dead
Idols. For though the Idols were Silver and Gold, the work of Mens
hands, and had eyes and saw not, _ears and heard not, feet and walked
not, mouths and spoke not_, neither was there breath in their Nostrils:
And though the common people could not but know this, for as _Isaiah_
saith they were so blinded that, _None considereth in his heart, neither
is there knowledge or understanding to say, I have burnt part of it in
the fire; yea also I have baked bread with the coals thereof, I have
roasted flesh and eaten it, and shall I make the residue thereof an
abomination? shall I fall down to the stock of a tree?_ Yet
notwithstanding were they so deluded by the crafty Impostures, and
subtile Divinations of all the several sorts of these Jugling Priests,
that they ran to ask counsel at these dead Idols, who (as they falsly
perswaded the people) did inspire them, and gave them answers, when the
Idols were all dead things, and gave no answers at all. And this is that
consulting with the dead, that all these couzening Priests did draw the
people unto, and therefore in general is here forbidden.
[Sidenote: Isai. 8. 19.]
3. The words of the Prophet, where he saith [_And when they shall say
unto you, seek unto them that are_ Ob or Oraclers, _and unto wizards
that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for
the living to the dead?_] do fully prove as much; for the sense must be
this: That the people of God ought to seek unto their own God, who was
and is a true and a living God, and to his Law & Testimonies, and not to
those peepers and mutterers that seek counsel of the dead Idols only;
and doubtless this is the true meaning of consulting the dead.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account