The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
4. This exposition includeth no absurdity, nor bringeth any
inconvenience, and is genuine, and not wrested; whereas the other doth
hurry in a whole heap of most absurd doubts, questions and opinions. But
if in this exposition we be Heterodoxal, we crave pardon, and referr it
to the judgment of those that are learned, of what perswasion soever
they be.
[Sidenote: _In Dan._ _c._ 1. _v._ 20. _p._ 87.]
10. Another word that is used in divers places of Scripture is
חַרְטֻמִּים, which though _Avenarius_ doth derive from חֶרֶט _stilus
&_ אָטַם _clausit_, yet the learned person _Masius_ saith, _Est autem
aliarum nationum vocabulum, ab Hebræa lingua alienum & peregrinum,
usurpatum tamen ab Hebræis_. And also the judicious _Polanus_ is of the
same opinion, that it is a word strange and foreign from the Hebrew
language. The Translators are all so various about the proper derivation
and signification of it, that it were but lost time and labour to recite
them: But it is manifest that it was a general word for one that was
skilful in all, or divers sorts of these Divinations, and might best be
constantly rendred _magos_, and that for these reasons.
[Sidenote: A Candle in the dark, p. 11.]
1. It is the opinion of _Masius_ and Mr. _Ady_ that it is a general
word, and signifieth one that hath skill in many of these kind of arts,
(if they may be so called) the latter of which saith thus: “It is taken
in the general sense for _magus_ a Magician; that hath one, or all these
crafts or Impostures.” And the former quoting the sentence of _Rabbi
Isaac Natar_, saith: _Hoc nomine vocatos esse ab Hebræis quosvis, qui
inter gentes singularem profitebantur sapientiam; præsertim cùm ea ad
superstitionem pertineret_.
2. Because that in _Exodus_ 7. 13. those that there are called
_Hachamim_ and _Mechassephim_, that is _sapientes & præstigiatores_, as
_Tremellius_ renders it, which is most proper and genuine, are there
called _Hartummim Mezeraim_, that is _Magos Ægypti_, the Magicians of
_Ægypt_; by which it appeareth plainly that it is a general name, and
may most properly be rendered a Magician.
3. It may most properly be taken for a Magician, because those that
acted before _Pharaoh_ are called by that name, and excepting their
opposing of _Moses_, and their superstition, it doth not appear that
they dealt with unlawful Magick, as we shall prove undeniably hereafter.
[Sidenote: 2 Sam. 12. 19.]
[Sidenote: Psal. 41. 7.]
[Sidenote: Isai. 26. 16.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account