The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
[Sidenote: _De Arte Lullian. Præf._]
[Sidenote: _Vide Relat. Paris. impres. Gallicè, 1631._]
4. It hath fared no better with divers persons that have written of
abstruse and mysterious Subjects, such as were _Arnoldus de Villa Nova_
and _Raimundus Lullius_, who, because they handled that secret and
sublime Art of the Transmutation of Metals, were by the ignorance and
malice of _Francis Pegna_ and the _John Tredeschen_ of _Rome_,
_Athanasius Kircherus_, with some others, branded with the name of
Magicians, taken in the worst sense. _Facile est reprehendere &
maledicere_, so apt are men through over-weening pride and
self-conceitedness, as though they were ignorant of nothing, to take
upon them to censure all things, when Artists only are fit to judge of
those proper Arts, in which they are verst and bred in, and not others:
For it is not sufficient for a man to be verst in many parts of
Learning, but also in that very Science or Art, in which the Question is
propounded: as for Example; Suppose a man to be well read in School
Theology, Metaphysicks, Logick, Grammar, Rhetorick, Ethicks, and
Physicks, yet for all this how unable were he to resolve one of the
difficultest Propositions in _Euclid_? no more can any person, though
never so generally learned, if he perfectly do not understand the
method, terms, ground, matter, and end of the Writers in mystical
Chymistry, be any competent Judge of their Art, nor of the nature of
Transmutation. And this might justly have bridled _Kircher_, and many
other rash and vain Censurers to hold back their judgment, until they
perfectly understand the matter, about which they are to give judgment,
and to have considered that Maxime of the wisest of men: _Seest thou a
man wise in his own conceit? there is more hope of a fool than of him._
But notwithstanding these groundless slanders against _Arnoldus_, that
he was guilty of Diabolical Magick, from which the Pen of learned
_Nandæus_ hath totally discharged him, though he otherwise (according to
his petulant humor and prejudiced opinion against the Art of
Transmutation, of which he was no competent Judge, for the reason
foregoing) cast some unworthy reflections both upon him, and _Lully_,
yet he confesseth (which is but the bare truth, as every learned
Physician doth sufficiently know, that have heedfully read his Writings
of the Art of Medicine) in these words, “That it is certain, he was the
learnedest Physician of his time, equally acquainted with the Latine,
Greek, and Arabian Tongues, and one whose Writings sufficiently witness
his abilities in the Mathematicks, Medicine, and Philosophy, the
practice whereof gained him favour and imployment about Pope _Clement_,
and _Frederick_ King of _Sicily_, who certainly would never have made
use of him, if he had thought him a Conjurer or Magician, such as many
judged he was.” As for _Lully_ (notwithstanding the malevolent froth of
some rash, malicious, and ignorant Writers) he was guilty of no other
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account