The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
5. _Roger Bacon_ our Countryman, who was a _Franciscan_ Fryar, and
Doctor of Divinity, the greatest Chymist, Astrologer, and Mathematician
of his time, yet could not escape the injurious and unchristian censure
of being a Conjurer, and so hard put to it, that as _Pitts_ saith, he
was twice cited to _Rome_ by _Clement_ the Fourth, to purge himself of
that accusation, and was forced to send his Optical and Mathematical
Instruments to _Rome_, to satisfie the Pope and the Conclave, which he
amply performed, and came off with honor and applause. To vindicate whom
I need say little, because it is already performed by the Pens of those
learned persons, _Pitts_, _Leland_, _Selden_, and _Nandæus_, only I
shall add one Sentence forth of that most learned Treatise, _De mirabili
potestate artis & naturæ, & de nullitate magiæ_. Where he saith thus:
_Quicquid autem est præter operationem naturæ vel artis, aut non est
humanum, aut est fictum & fraudibus occupatum_. Another of our
Country-men Dr. _John Dee_, the greatest and ablest Philosopher,
Mathematician, and Chymist that his Age (or it may be ever since)
produced, could not evade the censure of the Monster-headed multitude,
but even in his life time was accounted a Conjurer, of which he most
sadly (and not without cause) complaineth in his most learned Preface to
_Euclid_, Englished by Mr. _Billingsley_, and there strongly apologizeth
for himself, with that zeal and fervency, that may satisfie any rational
Christian, that he was no such wicked person, as to have visible and
familiar converse (if any such thing can be nowadays) with the Devil,
the known Enemy of Mankind, of which take this short passage, where he
saith: “O my unkind Country-men, O unnatural Country-men, O unthankful
Country-men, O brain-sick, rash, spiteful, and disdainful Country-men,
why oppress you me thus violently with your slandering of me contrary to
verity, and contrary to your own consciences?” Yet notwithstanding this,
and his known abilities in the most parts of abstruse Learning, the
great respect that he had from divers Princes, Nobles, and the most
Learned in all _Europe_, could not protect him from this harsh and
unjust censure. For Dr. _Casaubon_ near fifty years after Dr. _Dees_
death, hath in the year 1659. published a large Book in Folio of _Dees_
conversing for many years with Spirits (wicked ones he meaneth.) But how
Christian-like this was done, to wound the mans reputation so many years
after his death, and with that horrid and wicked slander of having
familiarity with Devils for many years in his life time, which tends to
the loss both of body and soul, and to register him amongst the damned,
how Christian-like this is, I leave all Christians to judge? Besides,
let all the World judge in this case, that Dr. _Casaubon_ being a sworn
Witchmonger, even to the credulity of the filthiest and most impossible
of their actions, cannot but allow of the Law that doth punish them for
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account