The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
1. Those that affirm that the Devil did or can produce such strange
effects, do also acknowledge, that what he performeth in natural and
elementary Bodies, is done by applying natural agents to natural and fit
patients, which do truly bring to pass such strange effects, and that he
doth no more, but only make the local application of them. From whence
it must necessarily follow that the effects flow from natural agents,
and so no causality at all can be ascribed unto him, except that
fictitious one of being _causa sine qua non_, which is as much as no
cause. And besides that, there is no proof that he maketh this local
application; for if he be incorporeal, then it is simply impossible that
he should perform any such matter; and however, a man by natural power
and means, if he know the fit and apt actives and passives, may perform
them himself, and so his assistance is needless; and we have never yet
met with any argument that bore any convincing force that might induce
us to believe that he is so great a Naturalist.
[Sidenote: _Argum. 2._]
[Sidenote: _De secret. oper. Art. & natur._ _c._ 5.]
[Sidenote: Gen. 30. 37, 38, 39. _&c._]
2. There are many persons that think themselves no mean sharers in the
most sorts of learning, and others that are very strait laced in their
pretended zeal for godliness, and in detesting the works of Satan, that
even startle and shew an abhorrency at the word Magick, if it be but
once named, as though there were no Magick but what is diabolical, or
that which they call diabolical were any other way evil but only in the
end and use: for there are many plants and minerals, that though
poysonous, are yet notwithstanding good in respect of their Creation,
and the good uses that may be made of them, as to kill noxious animals
that are hurtful unto man. But if any force of malice and wickedness
should use them to poyson and destroy Men and Women, it were wicked and
diabolical in the end and use, yet were the means lawful and natural. So
whatsoever the Devil may do by wicked Men, his instruments, in leading
and drawing them to make use of the great _magnalia naturæ_, to work
strange wonders by, thereby to confirm Idolatry and Superstition, or to
resist the truth and such devilish ends, though the end and use may be
wicked and diabolical, yet the efficient cause is natural and lawful.
And therefore we can find no other ground or reason of dividing Magick
into natural and Diabolical, but only that they differ in the end and
use: for otherwise they both work by a natural agency and means, seeing
the Devil can do nothing above or contrary to that course that God hath
set in nature. Therefore may men do without the aid of Devils whatsoever
they can do, seeing they have no advantage over us, but operate only by
applying active things to passive, like as Men do: And therefore said
that most learned Philosopher, Chymist and Mathematician, our
Countreyman _Roger Bacon_, excellent well in these words: _non igitur
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account