The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
6. The last thing that we shall handle concerning this controverted
subject, is the examination of the grounds and reasons of those that are
of a different judgment, which may be comprised in these three several
heads. 1. Some do conceive that it was the Body of _Samuel_ that was
raised up, and acted by his soul or by Satan. 2. Some hold that it was
_Samuels_ Soul that appeared in the shape and habit, that he had living.
3. Others do positively affirm that it was the Devil that assumed the
shape of _Samuel_, and so acted the whole business, by a compact betwixt
him and the Woman. These we shall confute in order.
[Sidenote: Philipp. 3. 21.]
[Sidenote: Matth. 27. 52, 53.]
[Sidenote: _Caten. Aur. Tho. Aquin. in_ Matth. 27.]
[Sidenote: Revel. 14. 13.]
1. That it was not the Body of _Samuel_ that was raised up, nor the Soul
joyned with it, that acted _Samuels_ part, is manifest from these
reasons. 1. Because _Samuels_ Body had lain too long in the grave, for
some account it near two years, and therefore must needs in a great part
be corrupted, wasted and disfigured, that none could have certainly
known that it was _Samuel_. 2. It must have been so putrified and
stinking, that none could have endured near it, for the noisome and
horrible smell. 3. Who should have covered it with the mantle, which had
it been buried with him, must in so long a time, have been rotten and
consumed? Surely there were no Taylors in the Grave, to make him a new
one, but (in reason and likelihood) if it had been his Body, it should
have appeared in Linnen, or a winding-sheet, if that had not been rotten
likewise. 4. To raise a Body, so long dead, must needs have required an
omnipotent power, for it is the Almighty power of Christ alone, that
raiseth up the vile Bodies of his Saints, and maketh them like his
glorious Body. And therefore neither the woman with all her Divinations,
nor all the Devils in Hell, nor any created power, but the Lord
Almighty, could have wrought this miracle, who would never have done it,
to gratifie the humour, or to magnifie the cheating craft of an
idolatrous, wicked and couzening Witch. And if the Devil or any created
power could raise up the Body of a departed Saint, then the rising out
of the Graves of many Bodies of Saints, that had slept, and their coming
into the holy City, and appearing unto many, after Christ was risen from
the dead, had been no certain, or convincing argument, of the undoubted
truth of the Divinity and Resurrection of our most Blessed Saviour. But
they were most infallible evidences of them both, as saith the Father S.
_Hierome_ in these words, _Sic multa corpora sanctorum resurrexerunt, ut
dominum ostenderent resurgentem, & tamen cum monumenta aperta sunt, non
ante resurrexerunt quàm resurgeret dominus, ut esset primogenitus
resurrectionis à mortuis_. 5. That it was not _Samuels_ Soul joyned with
the Body, that acted this, we thus argue: That Tenent that is flatly
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account