The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
4. Those that are much affected to and zealous for experimental
Philosophie, do often run into that extream, as utterly to condemn and
throw away all the ancient Scholastick Learning, as though there were
nothing in it of verity or worth: But this is too severe and dissonant
from truth, as might be made manifest in many of their Maximes; but we
shall only instance in one as pertinent to our present purpose, which is
this: _Imaginatio non transcendit Continuum_. And this if we perpend it
seriously, is a most certain and transcendant truth; for when we come to
cogitate and conceive of a thing, we cannot apprehend it otherwise than
as continuate and corporeal; for what other notions soever we make of
things, they are but adventitious, arbitrary, and fictitious, for even
_non entia ad modum entium concipiuntur_. And therefore those that
pretend that Angels are meerly incorporeal, must needs err, and put
force upon their own faculties, which cannot conceive a thing that is
not continuate and corporeal: But if they will trust their own
Cogitations and faculties rightly disposed, and not vitiated, then they
must believe that Angels are Corporeal, and not meerly and simply
spirits, for absolutely nothing is so but God only.
[Sidenote: _Argum. 5._]
[Sidenote: _Vid. Rob. Fludd. utri. Cosm. Hist._ _Tract._ 1. _l._ 4. _c._
2. _p._ 110.]
5. If the Angelical nature were simply and absolutely spiritual and
incorporeal, then they would be of the same essential Identity with God,
which is simply impossible. For the Angels were not Created forth of any
part of Gods Essence, for then he should be divisible, which he is not,
nor can be, his Essence being simplicity, unity, and Identity it self,
and therefore the Angels must of necessity be of an essence of Alterity,
and different from the essence of God. Now God being a simple, pure, and
absolute spirit in the Identity of his essence, if the Angels were
simply and absolutely spiritual and incorporeal, then they must be of
the same essence with him, which is absurd and impossible; and therefore
they have Alterity in them, and so of necessity must be Corporeal, and
not simply and meerly spiritual. And that as much as we contend for here
is granted by D^r _Moore_ in these words: “For (he saith) I look upon
Angels to be as truly a compound Being consisting of soul and body, as
that of men and brutes.” Whereby he plainly asserteth their Composition,
and so their Alterity, and therefore that they must needs have an
_Internum_ and _externum_, as the learned and Christian Philosopher D^r
_Fludd_ doth affirm in these words: _Certum est igitur inesse ipsis
(scilicet Angelis) aliud, quod agit, aliud autem, quod patitur; nec verò
illud secundùm quod agunt, aliud quam actus esse poterit, qui forma
dicitur; neq; etiam illud secundum quod patiuntur, est quicquam præter
potentiam, hæc autem materia appellatur_.
[Sidenote: _Argum. 6._]
[Sidenote: _Serm._ 6 _sup. Cantic._ _p._ 505.]
[Sidenote: _Lib._ 5.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account