The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
6. Therefore to conclude, these arguments do sufficiently and evidently
prove that Angels are either Corporeal, or have bodies united unto them,
which is all one to our purpose whether way soever it be taken. To which
only we shall add these authorities; and first S. _Bernard_ tells us
thus much rendered into English. “Therefore (he saith) as we render unto
God alone true immortality, so also incorporeity, because he alone doth
so far transcend the universal Corporeal nature of spirits, that he doth
not stand need of any body whatsoever, in any operation whatsoever,
being content with only a spiritual nodd (or motion) when he will, to
perform whatsoever he pleaseth. Therefore only that majesty of his, is
that, which neither for himself, nor for another, hath need of the help
of a Corporeal instrument, by which omnipotent will he is immediately
present at every work.” And that of _Damascen_ is full to the purpose,
which is this: “That Angels _quantum ad nos_, are said to be incorporeal
and immaterial: but compared to God, are found to be Corporeal and
material.” And of this opinion besides were _Tertullian_, S. _Augustin_,
_Nazianzen_, _Beda_, and many others, as may be seen in the learned
Writings of _Zanchy_ upon this subject: with whose words we shall shut
up this particular: _Certum enim est, ex iis quæ scripturæ tradunt de
Angelis, probabiliorem esse Patrum sententiam, quàm Scholasticorum:
utram tamen sequaris, non multum peccaveris, nec proptereà inter
Hæreticos haberi poteris_.
And on the otherside, if they be holden to be simply and absolutely
incorporeal, then these absurdities must of necessity follow.
1. If Angels be simply incorporeal, then they can cause no Physical or
local motion at all, because nothing can be moved but by contact, and
that must either be by immediate or virtual contact, for the Maxime is
certain, _Quicquid agit, agit vel mediatione suppositi_, as when ones
hand doth immediately touch a thing and so move it; _vel mediatione
virtutis_, as when a man with a rod or a line, doth draw a thing forth
of the water, both of these do require a Corporeal contact, that is,
that the superficies of the body moving or drawing, must either
mediately or immediately touch the superficies of the body to be moved
or drawn. But that which is absolutely incorporeal hath no superficies
at all, and therefore can make no contact either mediate or immediate;
and therefore Angels if simply incorporeal, can cause no Physical or
local motion at all.
[Sidenote: The Immortal. _l._ 1. _c._ 10. _p._ 72.]
[Sidenote: _Princip. Phil._ _Part._ 2. _p._ 40.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account