The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
1. Because there is no opinion (especially about created things) but it
hath once been new; and if an opinion should be rejected meerly because
of novelty, then it will follow, that either all opinions might have
been rejected for that very reason, or that novelty is no safe ground
only, why an opinion should be opposed or rejected.
2. Antiquity and Novelty are but relations _quoad nostrum intellectum,
non quoad naturam_; for the truth, as it is fundamentally in things
_extra intellectum_, cannot be accounted either old or new. And an
opinion, when first found out and divulged, is as much a truth then, as
when the current of hundreds or thousands of years have passed since its
discovery. For it was no less a truth, when in the infancy of Philosophy
it was holden, that there was generation and corruption in Nature, in
respect of Individuals, than it is now: so little doth Time, Antiquity,
or Novelty alter, change, confirm, or overthrow truth; for _veritas est
temporis filia_, in regard of its discovery to us or by us, who must
draw it forth _è puteo Democriti_. And the existence of the
_West-Indies_ was as well before the discovery made by _Columbus_ as
since, and our ignorance of it did not impeach the truth of its being,
neither did the novelty of its discovery make it less verity, nor the
years since make it more: so that we ought simply to examine, whether an
opinion be possible or impossible, probable or improbable, true or
false; and if it be false, we ought to reject it, though it seem never
so venerable by the white hairs of Antiquity; nor ought we to refuse it,
though it seem never so young, or near its birth. For as St. _Cyprian_
said: _Error vetustatis est vetustas erroris_.
[Sidenote: Advanc. of Learn. l. 1. c. 5.]
3. In regard of Natural Philosophy, and the knowledge of the properties
of created things, and the knowledge of them, we preposterously reckon
former Ages, and the men that lived in them, the Ancients; which in
regard of production and generation of the Individuals of their own
Species are so; but in respect of knowledge and experience, this Age is
to be accounted the most ancient. For as the learned Lord _Bacon_ saith:
“Indeed to speak truly, _Antiquitas seculi, juventus mundi_,” Antiquity
of time is the youth of the World. Certainly our times are the ancient
times, when the World is now ancient, and not those which we count
ancient, _ordine retrogrado_, by a computation backward from our own
times; and yet so much credit hath been given to old Authors, as to
invest them with the power of Dictators, that their words should stand,
rather than admit them as Consuls to give advice.
[Sidenote: _Rule 3._]
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account