The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
[Sidenote: _Pag._ 96, 97.]
“That though the New Testament had mentioned nothing of this matter, yet
its silence in such cases is not argumentative. He said nothing of those
large unknown Tracts of _America_, nor gave he any intimations of as
much as the existence of that numerous people; much less did he leave
instructions about their Conversion. He gives no account of the affairs
and state of the other World, but only that general one of the happiness
of some, and the misery of others. He made no discovery of the
_Magnalia_ of Art or Nature, no not of those whereby the propagation of
the Gospel might have been much advanced, _viz._ the Mystery of Printing
and the Magnet, and yet no one useth his silence in these instances as
an argument against the being of things, which are evident objects of
sense.” To which we answer.
[Sidenote: _Respons._]
1. He falleth into a common mistake in making the Proposition universal,
and _dolus versatur in universalibus_, when it ought but to be
particular: so for him to say, that no silence of Scripture is
argumentative, is too universal; for its silence in point of Geography,
as in describing _America_, and the people thereof, nor in discovering
the _Magnalia Naturæ & Artis_ is not argumentative; and we do not say,
that all silence of Scripture is argumentative, but yet we affirm that
some silence of Scripture is argumentative. So we cannot universally
say, that nothing hath a being but what is mentioned in Scripture; but
we may very well affirm, that some things have no being, or truth of
existence, because not declared in Scripture.
[Sidenote: _Lib._ 1. _c._ 1.]
2. The Scriptures were not written to teach Natural Philosophy, Arts or
Sciences, humane Policy, or the like; but were given, _that the man of
God might be perfect, furnished for every good work_: and it is by them
that we have the doctrine of eternal Salvation revealed unto us, and we
positively affirm the sufficiency of the Scriptures unto Salvation,
which thing no Orthodox Divine (we suppose) will deny, and _Bellarmine_
himself did confess in these words: _Prophetici & Apostolici libri sunt
verum verbum Dei, ac stabilis regula fidei_. And if it be a certain Rule
of Faith, and the true Word of God, then whatsoever it is silent of, we
ought not to believe, and so its silence is argumentative in that point.
The Scriptures are utterly silent concerning Purgatory, and therefore it
is a good argument to affirm there is no such place as Purgatory,
because the Word of God is silent as concerning it; but if it had been
necessary to have been believed, then there would have been mention made
of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account