The Divine and Perpetual Obligation of the Observance of the Sabbath, with Reference more Especially to a Pamphlet Lately Puvblished by the Rev. C.J. Vaughan, D.D., Head Master of Harrow School, Entitled “A Few Words on the Crystal Palace Question”Perowne, John
Religion
The Divine and Perpetual Obligation of the Observance of the Sabbath, with Reference more Especially to a Pamphlet Lately Puvblished by the Rev. C.J. Vaughan, D.D., Head Master of Harrow School, Entitled “A Few Words on the Crystal Palace Question”
Perowne, John
Sabbath -- Biblical teaching; Vaughan, C. J. (Charles John), 1816-1897. A few words on the Crystal Palace question
But there is one passage of the New Testament, which, in the absence of a
positive enunciation to the contrary, to our mind, of itself establishes
the permanent authority of the decalogue, and which, when added to what
has already been said, more than completes the proof that has been
demanded of us. We allude to our Lord’s declaration: “Think not that I
am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy but
to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one
jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be
fulfilled.” {29a} There can scarcely be a doubt to what the Redeemer
refers when he speaks of “the law and the prophets.” He could not intend
the ceremonial law, because the breaking of its least commands would not
make a man “least in the kingdom of heaven.” Neither was it true that he
did not come to put an end to its observance. It is the moral law, and
those instructions of the prophets which flow from it—it is “the law and
the prophets” as embraced in the precept, “thou shalt love the Lord thy
God with all thy heart, and thy neighbour as thyself,” which our Lord
evidently meant. The entire discourse to which this declaration forms
the introduction, is of a moral character; and whatever meanings may have
been put upon our Lord’s language, we think any unbiased mind, on reading
the whole discourse, will come to the conclusion, that the moral law was
chiefly and prominently in the Saviour’s mind, when he employed the
language above quoted. {29b} But if one jot or tittle cannot pass away
from the law, how should the entire law be abrogated? We conclude,
therefore, that there is satisfactory evidence in the New Testament, that
the decalogue is still in force in the Christian church—not so indeed
that obedience to it forms the ground of the believer’s justification, or
that want of perfect conformity to its requirements brings him under
condemnation (this was not the case under the Jewish dispensation), but
as the standard of right and wrong, as the infallible regulator of
conscience, as that perfect rule of moral obligation, by seeking
conformity to which we honour our Creator and Redeemer, perform the
duties of this present life, and become fitted for the presence of God
and the inheritance of the saints in light. To the believer the moral
law has always been “the law of liberty,” because, it being “written in
his heart,” he has “delighted in it after the inner man,” and kept its
precepts from a principle of love.
* * * * *
THE END.
* * * * *
NORWICH:
PRINTED BY THOMAS PRIEST, RAMPANT HORSE STREET.
FOOTNOTES.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account