“Do you know, Sir, what mutton broth means at a city breakfast on the
Lord Mayor's Day, mutton broth being the appointed breakfast for that
festival? It means according to established usage—by liberal
interpretation—mutton broth and every thing else that can be wished
for at a breakfast. So, Sir, you have here not only what the title
seems to specify, but every thing else that can be wished for in a
book. In treating of the Doctor, it treats _de omnibus rebus et
quibusdam aliis_. It is the Doctor &c., and that &c., like one of
Lyttleton's, implies every thing that can be deduced from the words
preceding.
“But I maintain that the little which has been said of comical old
Textor (for it is little compared to what his Dialogues contain)
strictly relates to the main thread of this most orderly and well
compacted work. You will remember that I am now replying to the
question proposed in the third chapter P. I. ‘Who was the Doctor?’ And
as he who should undertake to edite the works of Chaucer, or Spenser,
or Shakespear would not be qualified for the task, unless he had made
himself conversant with the writings of those earlier authors, from
whose storehouses (as far as they drew from books) their minds were
fed; so it behoved me (as far as my information and poor ability
extend) to explain in what manner so rare a character as Dr. Dove's
was formed.
“_Quo semel est imbuta recens_,—you know the rest of the quotation,
Sir. And perhaps you may have tasted water out of a beery glass,—which
it is not one or two rinsings that can purify.
“You have seen yew trees cut into the forms of pyramids, chess-kings,
and peacocks:—nothing can be more unlike their proper growth—and yet
no tree except the yew could take the artificial figures so well. The
garden passes into the possession of some new owner who has no taste
for such ornaments: the yews are left to grow at their own will; they
lose the preposterous shape which had been forced upon them, without
recovering that of their natural growth, and what was formal becomes
grotesque—a word which may be understood as expressing the incongruous
combination of formality with extravagance or wildness.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account