The Doves, father as well as son, were blest with a hearty
intellectual appetite, and a strong digestion: but the son had the
more catholic taste. He would have relished caviare; would have
ventured upon laver undeterred by its appearance—and would have liked
it.
What an excellent thing did God bestow on man
When he did give him a good stomach![1]
[Footnote 1: BEAUMONT and FLETCHER.]
He would have eaten sausages for breakfast at Norwich, Sally Luns at
Bath, Sweet Butter in Cumberland, Orange Marmalade at Edinburgh,
Findon Haddocks at Aberdeen, and drunk punch with Beef steaks to
oblige the French if they insisted upon obliging him with a _dejeûner
a l'Angloise_.
A good digestion turneth all to health.[2]
[Footnote 2: HERBERT.]
He would have eaten squab-pye in Devonshire, and the pye which is
squabber than squab in Cornwall; sheep's head with the hair on in
Scotland, and potatoes roasted on the hearth in Ireland; frogs with
the French, pickled herrings with the Dutch, sour-krout with the
Germans, maccaroni with the Italians, aniseed with the Spaniards,
garlic with any body; horse-flesh with the Tartars; ass-flesh with the
Persians; dogs with the North Western American Indians, curry with the
Asiatic East Indians, birds' nests with the Chinese, mutton roasted
with honey with the Turks, pismire cakes on the Orinoco, and turtle
and venison with the Lord Mayor; and the turtle and venison he would
have preferred to all the other dishes, because his taste, though
catholic, was not indiscriminating. He would have tried all, tasted
all, thriven upon all, and lived contentedly and cheerfully upon
either, but he would have liked best that which was best. And his
intellectual appetite had the same happy catholicism.
He would not have said with Euphues, “if I be in Crete, I can lie; if
in Greece, I can shift; if in Italy, I can court it:” but he might
have said with him, “I can carouse with Alexander; abstain with
Romulus; eat with the Epicure; fast with the Stoic; sleep with
Endymion; watch with Chrysippus.”
The Reader will not have forgotten I trust, (but if he should I now
remind him of it,) that in the brief inventory of Daniel's library
there appeared some odd volumes of that “book full of Pantagruelism,”
the inestimable life of the Great Gargantua. The elder Daniel could
make nothing of this book; and the younger, who was about ten years
old when he began to read it, less than he could of the Pilgrim's
Progress. But he made out something.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account