The maxim that an author who desires to make us weep must be affected
himself by what he writes, is too trite to be repeated in its original
language. Both authors and actors however can produce this effect
without eliciting a spark of feeling from their own hearts; and what
perhaps may be deemed more remarkable, they can with the same success
excite merriment in others, without partaking of it in the slightest
degree themselves. No man ever made his contemporaries laugh more
heartily than Scarron, whose bodily sufferings were such that he
wished for himself
_à toute heure
Ou la mort, ou santé meilleure:_
And who describes himself in his epistle to Sarazin, as
_Un Pauvret
Tres-maigret;
Au col tors,
Dont le corps
Tout tortu,
Tout bossu,
Suranné,
De'charné,
Est reduit
Jour et nuit,
A souffrir
Sans guerir
Des tourmens
Vehemens._
It may be said perhaps that Scarron's disposition was eminently
cheerful, and that by indulging in buffoonery he produced in himself a
pleasurable excitement not unlike that which others seek from strong
liquors, or from opium; and therefore that his example tends to
invalidate the assertion in support of which it was adduced. This is a
plausible objection; and I am far from undervaluing the philosophy of
Pantagruelism, and from denying that its effects may, and are likely
to be as salutary, as any that were ever produced by the proud
doctrines of the Porch. But I question Scarron's right to the
appellation of a Pantagruelist; his humour had neither the heighth nor
the depth of that philosophy.
There is a well-known anecdote of a physician, who being called in to
an unknown patient, found him suffering under the deepest depression
of mind, without any discoverable disease, or other assignable cause.
The physician advised him to seek for cheerful objects, and
recommended him especially to go to the theatre and see a famous actor
then in the meridian of his powers, whose comic talents were
unrivalled. Alas! the comedian who kept crowded theatres in a roar was
this poor hypochondriac himself!
The state of mind in which such men play their part, whether as
authors or actors, was confessed in a letter written from Yarmouth
Gaol to the Doctor's friend Miller, by a then well-known performer in
this line, George Alexander Stevens. He wrote to describe his distress
in prison, and to request that Miller would endeavour to make a small
collection for him, some night at a concert; and he told his sad tale
sportively. But breaking off that strain he said; “You may think I can
have no sense, that while I am thus wretched I should offer at
ridicule! But, Sir, people constituted like me, with a
disproportionate levity of spirits, are always most merry when they
are most miserable; and quicken like the eyes of the consumptive,
which are always brightest the nearer a patient approaches to
dissolution.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account