He had made another resolution, which was not kept, because it was not
reasonable. When the Earl of Holdernesse offered him the Rectory of
Aston, he was not in orders, and he called upon Warburton to ask his
advice. “I found him,” says Warburton, “yet unresolved whether he
should take the Living. I said, was the question about a mere secular
employment, I should blame him without reserve if he refused the
offer. But as I regarded going into orders in another light, I frankly
owned to him he ought not to go, unless he had a _call_: by which I
meant, I told him, nothing fanatical or superstitious; but an
inclination, and, on that, a resolution, to dedicate all his studies
to the service of religion, and totally to abandon his poetry. This
sacrifice, I said, I thought was required at any time, but more
indispensably so in this, when we are fighting with infidelity _pro
aris et focis_. This was what I said; and I will do him the justice to
say, that he entirely agreed with me in thinking that decency,
reputation, and religion, all required this sacrifice of him; and
that, if he went into orders, he intended to give it.” “How much shall
I honour him,” says Warburton in another letter, “if he performs his
promise to me of putting away those idle baggages after his sacred
espousals!” This unwise promise explains Mason's long silence as a
poet, and may partly account for his uncomfortable state of mind as
long as he considered himself bound by it.
There were other circumstances about him which were unfavourable to
happiness; he seems never to have been of a cheerful, because never of
a hopeful temper; otherwise Gray would not have spoken of his
“insatiable repining mouth,”—the lively expression of one who clearly
perceived his constitutional faults, and yet loved him, as he deserved
to be loved, in spite of them. The degree of malice also, which Gray
noticed as the strongest passion in his nature, is to be reckoned
among those circumstances. By far the most popular of his compositions
were those well known satires which he never owned, and which
professional critics with their usual lack of acumen, pronounced not
to be his because of their sarcastic humour and the strength of their
language. He had a great deal of that sarcastic humour, and this it
was which Gray called malice; in truth it partakes of maliciousness,
and a man is the worse for indulging it, if he ever allows himself to
give it a personal direction, except in cases where strong provocation
may warrant and strict justice require it. That these satires were
written by Mason will appear upon the most indisputable proof whenever
his letters shall be published; and it is earnestly hoped those
letters may not be allowed to perish, for in them and in them only
will the character of the writer appear in its natural lights and
shades.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account