Robert Wilmot _says_, I say, using the present tense in setting his
words before the reader, because of an author it may truly be said
that “being dead he yet speaketh.” Obscure as this old author now is,
for his name and his existing works are known only to those who love
to pore among the tombs and the ruins of literature, yet by those who
will always be enough “to make a few,” his name will continue to be
known, long after many of those bubbles which now glitter as they
float upon the stream of popularity are “gone for ever;” and his
remains are safe for the next half millennium, if the globe should
last so long without some cataclasm which shall involve its creatures
and its works in one common destruction.
Wilmot is right in saying that whatever is written for the public, is
as regards the individual responsibility of the writer, written for
eternity, however brief may be its earthly duration;—an aweful
consideration for the authors of wicked books, and for those who by
becoming instrumental in circulating such books, involve themselves in
the author's guilt as accessaries after the fact, and thereby bring
themselves deservedly under the same condemnation.
Looking at the first question in this point of view, it may be
answered without hesitation, the Doctor was so pure in heart, and
consequently so innocent in mind that there was no moral reason why he
ought not to have been an author. He would have written nothing but
what,—religiously speaking might have been accounted among his good
works,—so far as, so speaking, any works may deserve to be called
good.
But the question has two handles, and we must now take it by the
other.
An author more obscure in the literature of his own country than
Wilmot, (unless indeed some Spanish or Italian Haslewood may have
disinterred his name) has expressed an opinion, directly the reverse
of Wilmot's concerning authorship. Ye who understand that noble
language which the Emperor Charles V. ranked above all other living
tongues may have the satisfaction of here reading it in the original.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account