Reuchlin, or Capnio (as he who was one of the lights of his generation
was misnamed and misnamed himself,) who had with his other great and
eminent merits that of restoring or rather introducing into Germany
the study of Hebrew, revived the lost art of comedy. If any one had
preceded him in this revival, Macropedius was ignorant of it, and by
the example and advice of this great man he was induced to follow him,
not only as a student of Hebrew, but as a comic writer. Hrosvitha
indeed, a nun of Gandersheim in Saxony, who lived in the tenth century
and in the reign of Otho II. composed six Latin comedies _in
emulation_ of Terence, but in praise of virginity; and these with
other of her poems were printed at Nuremberg in the year 1501. The
book I have never seen, nor had De Bure, nor had he been able (such is
its rarity) to procure any account of it farther than enabled him to
give its title. The name of Conrad Celtes, the first German upon whom
the degree of Poet Laureate was conferred, appears in the title, as if
he had discovered the manuscript; _Conrado Celte inventore_. De Bure
says the volume was _attribué au même Conradus Celtes_. It is rash for
any one to form an opinion of a book which he has never examined,
unless he is well acquainted with the character and capacity of its
author; nevertheless I may venture to observe that nothing can be less
in unison with the life and conversation of this Latin poet, as far as
these may be judged of by his acknowledged poems, than the subjects of
the pieces published under Hrosvitha's name; and no reason can be
imagined why if he had written them himself, he should have palmed
them upon the public as her composition.
It is remarkable that Macropedius when he spoke of Reuchlin's comedies
should not have alluded to these, for that he must have seen them
there can be little or no doubt. One of Reuchlin's is said to have
been imitated from _la Farce de Pathelin_, which under the title of
the Village Lawyer has succeeded on our own stage, and which was so
deservedly popular that the French have drawn from it more than one
proverbial saying. The French Editor who affirms this says that
Pathelin was printed in 1474, four years before the representation of
Reuchlin's comedy, but the story is one of those good travellers which
are found in all countries, and Reuchlin may have dramatised it
without any reference to the French drama, the existence of which may
very probably have been unknown to him, as well as to Macropedius.
Both his pieces are satirical. His disciple began with a scriptural
drama upon the Prodigal Son, Asotus is its title. It must have been
written early in the century, for about 1520 he laid it aside as a
juvenile performance, and faulty as much because of the then
comparatively rude state of learning, as of his own inexperience.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account