Madam Epicuria, who is not the most affectionate of wives, refuses to
accompany him upon this unpleasant expedient, and moreover requests
that her maids may be left with her; let him take his man servants
with him, and gold and silver in abundance. The servants bring out his
wealth. Plutus, _ex arcâ loquens_ is one of the Dramatis Personæ, and
the said Plutus when brought upon the stage in a chest, or strong box,
complains that he is shaken to pieces by being thus moved. Hecastus
tells him he must go with him to the other world and help him there,
which Plutus flatly refuses. If he will not go of his own accord he
shall be carried whether he will or no, Hecastus says. Plutus stands
stiffly to his refusal.
_Non transferent; prius quidem
Artus et ilia ruperint, quam transferant.
In morte nemini opitulor usquam gentium,
Quin magis ad alienum dominum transeo._
Hecastus on his part is equally firm, and orders his men to fetch some
strong poles, and carry off the chest, Plutus and all. Having sent
them forward, he takes leave of his family, and Epicuria protests that
she remains like a widowed dove, and his neighbours promise to
accompany him as far as the gate.
Death comes behind him now:
_Horrenda imago, larva abominabilis,
Figura tam execranda, ut atrum dæmona
Putetis obvium._[3]
[Footnote 3: The reader should by all means consult Mr. Sharpe's
“Dissertation on the Pageants or Dramatic Mysteries anciently
performed in Coventry.” “The Devil,” he observes, “was a very favorite
and prominent character in our Religious Mysteries, wherein he was
introduced as often as was practicable, and considerable pains taken
to furnish him with appropriate habiliments, &c.” p. 31. also pp.
57-60. There are several plates of “_Hell-Mought and Sir Sathanas_”
which will not escape the examination of the curious. The bloody Herod
was a character almost as famous as “_Sir Sathanas_”—hence the
expression “_to out-herod Herod_” _e.g._ in Hamlet, Act iii. Sc. ii.
With reference to the same personage Charmian says to the Soothsayer
in Antony and Cleopatra, “Let me have a child at fifty, to whom _Herod
of Jewry_ may do homage.” Act i. Sc. ii., and Mrs. Page asks in the
Merry Wives of Windsor, “What _Herod of Jewry_ is this?” Act ii. Sc.
i.]
This dreadful personage is with much difficulty intreated to allow him
the respite of one short hour, after which Death declares he will
return, and take him, will he or nill he before the Judge, and then to
the infernal regions. During this interval who should come up but an
old and long-neglected friend of Hecastus, Virtue by name; a poor
emaciated person, in mean attire, in no condition to appear with him
before the Judge, and altogether unfit to plead his desperate cause.
She promises however to send him a Priest to his assistance and says
moreover that she will speak to her sister Faith, and endeavour to
persuade her to visit him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account