When we regard the comparative sagacity of animals, it should always
be remembered that every creature, from the lowest point of sentient
existence upward, till we arrive at man, is endued with sagacity
sufficient to provide for its own well-being, and for the continuance
of its kind. They are gifted with greater endowments as they ascend in
the scale of being, and those who lead a life of danger, and at the
same time of enterprise, have their faculties improved by practice,
take lessons from experience, and draw rational conclusions upon
matters within their sphere of intellect and of action, more
sagaciously than nine tenths of the human race can do.
Now no other animal is placed in circumstances which tend so
continually to sharpen its wits,—(were I writing to the learned only,
I should perhaps say to acuate its faculties, or to develope its
intellectual powers,) as the rat, nor does any other appear to be of a
more improvable nature. He is of a most intelligent family, being
related to the Beaver. And in civilized countries he is not a wild
creature, for he follows the progress of civilization, and adapts his
own habits of life to it, so as to avail himself of its benefits.
The “pampered Goose” who in Pope's Essay retorts upon man, and says
that man was made for the use of Geese, must have been forgetful of
plucking time, as well as ignorant of the rites that are celebrated in
all old-fashioned families on St. Michael's day. But the Rat might
with more apparent reason support such an assertion: he is not
mistaken in thinking that corn-stacks are as much for his use as for
the farmers; that barns and granaries are his winter magazines; that
the Miller is his acting partner, the Cheesemonger his purveyor, and
the Storekeeper his steward. He places himself in relation with man,
not as his dependent like the dog, nor like the cat as his ally, nor
like the sheep as his property, nor like the ox as his servant, nor
like horse and ass as his slaves, nor like poultry who are to “come
and be killed” when Mrs. Bond invites them; but as his enemy, a bold
borderer, a Johnnie Armstrong or Rob Roy who acknowledge no right of
property in others, and live by spoil.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account