Wheresoever man goes, Rat follows, or accompanies him. Town or country
are equally agreeable to him. He enters upon your house as a tenant at
will, (his own, not yours,) works out for himself a covered way in
your walls, ascends by it from one story to another, and leaving you
the larger apartments, takes possession of the space between floor and
ceiling, as an entresol for himself. There he has his parties, and his
revels and his gallopades, (merry ones they are) when you would be
asleep, if it were not for the spirit with which the youth and belles
of Rat-land keep up the ball over your head. And you are more
fortunate than most of your neighbours, if he does not prepare for
himself a mausoleum behind your chimney-piece or under your
hearth-stone,[1] retire into it when he is about to die, and very soon
afford you full proof that though he may have lived like a hermit, his
relics are not in the odour of sanctity. You have then the additional
comfort of knowing that the spot so appropriated will thenceforth be
used either as a common cemetery, or a family vault. In this respect,
as in many others, nearer approaches are made to us by inferior
creatures than are dreamt of in our philosophy.
[Footnote 1: Southey alludes here to an incident which occurred in his
own house. On taking up the hearth-stone in the dining-room at
Keswick, it was found that the mice had made underneath it a Campo
Santo,—a depository for their dead.]
The adventurous merchant ships a cargo for some distant port, Rat goes
with it. Great Britain plants a colony in Botany Bay, Van Diemen's
Land, or at the Swan River, Rat takes the opportunity for colonizing
also. Ships are sent out upon a voyage of discovery. Rat embarks as a
volunteer. He doubled the Stormy Cape with Diaz, arrived at Malabar in
the first European vessel with Gama, discovered the new world with
Columbus and took possession of it at the same time, and
circumnavigated the globe with Magellan and with Drake and with Cook.
After all, the Seigneur de Humesesne, whatever were the merits of that
great case which he pleaded before Pantagruel at Paris, had reasonable
grounds for his assertion when he said, _Monsieur et Messieurs, si
l'iniquité des hommes estoit aussi facilement vuë en jugement
categorique, comme on connoit mousches en lait, le monde quatre bœufs
ne seroit tant mangé de Rats comme il est._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account