The answer from Konigsberg was not less favourable. The dispute which
Freitagius had raised, _infelix illa σύῤῥαξις_ they called it, ought
to have been carried on by that Professor with more moderation.
Granting that the souls of brutes were not created separately like
human souls but conjointly with the body, it still remained doubtful
_quomodo se habuerit divinum partim ad aquam et terram factum
mandatum, partim simultanea brutalium animarum cum corporibus
creatio._ For earth and water might here be variously considered, 1,
as the element, 2, as the matter, 3, as the subject, and 4, _ut mater
vel vivus uterus ad animalium productionem immediatâ Dei operatione
exaltatus._ Water and earth themselves were first created, and on the
fifth the vital and plastic power was communicated to them, in which
by virtue of the omnipotent word they still consist. They were of
opinion that the souls of brutes and of plants also, were divinely
raised above an elementary condition, it being always understood that
the human soul far transcended them. The expression of Moses that
formed every beast and every fowl out of the ground, proved not the
matter whereof, but the place wherein they were formed.
The Faculty at Jena returned a shorter reply. The ingratitude of the
world toward those who published their lucubrations upon such abstruse
points, reminded them they said of Luther's complaint in one of his
Prefaces: _Sæpe recordor boni Gersonis dubitantis num quid boni
publicè scribendmn et proferendum sit. Si scriptio omittitur, multæ
animæ negliguntur, quæ liberari potuissent; si verò illa præstatur,
statim Diabolus præstò est cum linguis pestiferis et calumniarum
plenis, quæ omnia corrumpunt et inficiunt._ What was said of the
production of fish, plants and animals might be understood
synecdochically, _salvâ verborum Mosaicorum integritate,_ as the text
also was to be understood concerning the creation of man, where it is
said that the Lord formed him of the dust of the earth, and
immediately afterwards that he breathed into his nostrils the breath
of life.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account