The doctor looks at biography : $b Psychological studies of life and lettersCollins, Joseph
History
The doctor looks at biography : $b Psychological studies of life and letters
Collins, Joseph
Autobiography; Biography as a literary form; Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- History and criticism
The autobiographer, on the other hand, must be subjective above all.
His glance and his attention must be turned on himself; his critical
powers and his gift of observation must be directed on his own
character. As John Addington Symonds truthfully said: “Autobiographies
written with a purpose are likely to want atmosphere.” A man when he
sits down to give an account of his own life, from the point of view of
art or accomplishment, passion or a particular action is apt to make
it appear as though he were nothing but an artist, lover, reformer, or
as though the action he seeks to explain were the principal event of
his existence. To paint a true portrait, he must supplement the bare
facts of his existence. He must reveal himself emotionally as well as
intellectually. It is the emotional revelation that gives atmosphere
to his story. Naturally such “atmosphere” should not exclude a certain
amount of objectivity; if the writer is too introspective, his memoirs
may prove stimulating and illuminating for the student of behaviour,
but will scarcely interest the general reader who is not content with
deductive and inductive ratiocination, but wants action mixed with
sentiment.
The biographer is not a judge, but a witness; the autobiographer may
be both. The former should have no preconceived idea of his hero. His
efforts should be concentrated on presenting him to posterity as he
appeared to his contemporaries, to himself and to those among whom
he lived, acted, enjoyed and suffered. Such restrictions can not be
imposed on the autobiographer who has a much wider field in which to
push his investigations on personality; whatever he chooses to say
or reveal must be accepted at its face value, and his judgment upon
himself must be impersonal--and there are no judgments so fallacious as
self-judgments. Biographies should study both sides of an individual;
what he did and what he was, since his notions are determined by
his personality characteristics; autobiographies need not deal with
achievements which, if they are worth while, make their own publicity;
the stress should be placed on the manifestation of personality--on
motives, passions, experiences, failures, and accomplishments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account