The Doctrine of the Lord's Supper. As Taught by the Church of EnglandHoare, Edward
Religion
The Doctrine of the Lord's Supper. As Taught by the Church of England
Hoare, Edward
Lord's Supper -- Church of England
_The Articles_.—There are seven Articles—xxv. to xxxi.—bearing more or
less upon the subject; and from these we may gather the real teaching of
our Church. The first of them, the twenty-fifth, refers to sacraments in
general. ‘Sacraments ordained of Christ be not only badges or tokens of
Christian men’s professions, but rather they be certain sure witnesses
and effectual signs of grace, and God’s good will towards us, by the
which He doth work invisibly in us, and doth not only quicken, but also
strengthen and confirm our faith in Him.’ In other words, before men
they are badges of our profession, and before God they are signs or
witnesses by which God works invisibly in the soul. In this definition
there is no idea of any change in the substance of the sign. The sign is
not described as being changed into the thing signified, but as being
accompanied by it, so that when the believer with the hand and lip
visibly receives the sign, it pleases God in His own great grace
invisibly to feed the soul and confirm the faith. The visible sign and
the invisible gift are therefore kept quite distinct. The one is
mercifully granted in connexion with the other, but never said to be
incorporated with it, for the sign would cease to be a sign if it were
changed into the thing signified. With this definition of a Sacrament,
the 27th Article—which describes that of baptism—exactly agrees. It
describes it not merely as a badge of a Christian man’s profession, but
also declares that it is a sign and means of grace. ‘A sign of
regeneration or new birth;’ a ‘means whereby as by an instrument, they
that receive baptism rightly (1) are grafted into the Church; (2) the
promises of forgiveness of sin, and of our adoption to be the sons of God
by the Holy Ghost, are visibly signed and sealed; (3) faith is confirmed,
and grace increased by virtue of prayer unto God.’ But no change is here
described as taking place in the water. It is nowhere said to be changed
into regeneration. The gifts described are God’s direct gifts to the
soul, and are never said to be infused into the element of water. The
water is sanctified, or set apart for sacramental use, but the
consecration produces no change in its quality or substance. The new
birth is not in the water, but is the act of the Holy Spirit moving in
the soul. The minister on earth visibly administers the visible sign to
the body, and we trust that God in heaven invisibly bestows the invisible
gift on the soul. It is not my business now to discuss the connexion
between the visible sign and the invisible gift. It is enough for my
present purpose to point out that the one is not changed into the other,
but that the water remains water, or, in other words, that the sign does
not cease to be a sign, as it would do if it were changed into the thing
signified.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account