The Draytons and the Davenants : $b A story of the Civil WarsCharles, Elizabeth Rundle
History
The Draytons and the Davenants : $b A story of the Civil Wars
Charles, Elizabeth Rundle
Great Britain -- History -- Civil War, 1642-1649 -- Fiction
"Some few friends reverently buried him in Barking Church to the
words of the old burial-service, prohibited by the Parliament a few
days before. All honour to them."
Said Aunt Gretel, when my Father had finished reading this letter,--
"It is a great pity the martyrs should not all be on the right side.
It would make it so very much easier to know which is the right."
"Martyrs on the wrong side," exclaimed Aunt Dorothy, indignantly;
"you might as well talk of orthodox heretics."
But my Father replied,--
"If obedience is better than sacrifice, then obedience is the best
part of the sacrifice of martyrdom; and may we not trust that the
Master may accept the act of obedience even of some who misread the
word of command?"
The next day he left us for London, and we saw him no more for many
months.
On the 29th of January, commissioners of the Parliament and of the
king met at Uxbridge to negotiate for peace. But they did not get on
at all. Dr. Stewart syllogistically defended the divine right of
Episcopacy, and Dr. Henderson the divine right of the Presbyterial
government. My Lord Hertford and my Lord Pembroke would have passed
this by, to proceed to the particular points to be settled; but the
divines declined to be hurried, insisting on disputing
syllogistically "as became scholars." So, after twenty days, Dr.
Stewart and Dr. Henderson, being each confirmed in their conviction
of his own orthodoxy, the commissioners separated with no further
result.
One evening, indeed, it is said, the king had consented to honourable
terms; but in the night a letter came from Montrose announcing
Royalist victories, and in the morning His Majesty retracted the
concessions of the evening.
Meanwhile the two armies continued fighting; not in two large bodies,
but in scattered skirmishes, sieges, surprises, all over the country,
making well-nigh every quiet home in England a sharer in the misery
and tumult of the war.
The moral difference between the forces of the Parliament and the
king became, it was said, more obvious. It could scarce be
otherwise. War must make men firmer in virtues or more desperate in
sin. Men must get less and less human with years of plundering, and
indulgence in every selfish sinful pleasure. No good woman durst
venture near the Royalist army, my Father said, and vice and
profaneness were scarcely punished; whereas in the Parliament camp,
as in a well-ordered city, passage was safe, and traffic free. It
was the armies of the great Gustavus and that of Wallenstein over
again. I think it would be blasphemy to deem such differences can
have no weight in a world where God is King.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account