The Draytons and the Davenants : $b A story of the Civil WarsCharles, Elizabeth Rundle
History
The Draytons and the Davenants : $b A story of the Civil Wars
Charles, Elizabeth Rundle
Great Britain -- History -- Civil War, 1642-1649 -- Fiction
The second entry was caused by an entirely different theory of
history, having its origin in a talk with Roger. Roger said that we
never can tell what things are historical until afterwards, and that
therefore the only way was to note down what honestly interests us.
If these things prove afterwards to be things which interest the
world, our story of them becomes part of the world's story, and, as
such, history to the people who care for us. But to note down feeble
echoes of far-off great events, in which we think we ought to be
interested, is no human speech at all, Roger thought, but mere
monkey's imitative chattering. Every one, Roger thinks, sees
everything just a little differently from any one else, and therefore
if every one would describe truly the little bit they do see, in that
way, by degrees, we might have a perfect picture. But to copy what
others have seen is simply to depart with every fresh copy a little
further from the original. If, for instance, said he, the nurse of
Julius Cæsar had told us nursery stories of what Julius Cæsar did
when he was a little boy, it would have been history; but the
opinions of Julius Cæsar's nurse on the politics of the Roman
republic would probably not have been history at all, but idle tattle.
With respect to kings and queens being the only true subjects for
history, also, Roger was very scornful. He had lately been paying a
visit to Mr. John Hampden, Mr. Oliver Cromwell, and others of my
father's friends, and he had returned full of indignation against the
tyranny of the court and the prelates. The nation, he said wise men
thought, was not made for the king, but the king for the nation.
And, to say nothing of the Greek history, the Bible history was
certainly not filled up with kings and queens, but with shepherds,
herdsmen, preachers, and soldiers; or if with kings, with kings who
had been shepherds and soldiers, and who were saints and heroes as
well as kings.
All which reasoning decided me to make my next entry concerning the
calf of the brindled cow, which at that time was the subject in the
world which honestly interested me the most. If my father, or Roger,
or Cousin Placidia, or Aunt Gretel, ever became historical personages
(and, as Roger said, who could tell?), then anecdotes concerning the
calf of the cow which my father owned and Aunt Gretel cherished, and
which Cousin Placidia thought it childish to care so much about,
might become, in a secondary sense, historical also. At all events,
I resolved I would not be like Julius Cæsar's nurse, babbling of
politics.
The next entry was:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account