The Duke's Daughter; and, The Fugitives; vol. 1/3 — John Shaqi
The Duke's Daughter; and, The Fugitives; vol. 1/3Oliphant, Mrs. (Margaret)
General
The Duke's Daughter; and, The Fugitives; vol. 1/3
Oliphant, Mrs. (Margaret)
Fiction
It has never been fully explained how it was that a person so thoroughly
experienced in the world as Lady Germaine should have permitted an
acquaintance between Lady Jane and Mr Winton to ripen under her roof.
That she should have introduced them to each other was nothing, of
course; for in society every gentleman is supposed the equal of every
other gentleman, though he has not a penny and his next neighbour may be
a millionaire; and Lady Jane was gracious in her high-minded, maidenly
way, as a princess should be, to everybody, to the clergyman, and even
to the clergyman’s sons, dangerous and detrimental young persons who
have to be asked to country houses, a perpetual alarm to anxious parents
who have daughters. No _hauteur_, no exclusiveness was in Lady Jane. She
was as much withdrawn above the young squire as the young curate, and
there was no reason why Mr Winton, who was very personable, very well
thought of, and in no sense of the word detrimental, should not pay his
homage to the Duke’s daughter. But there it should have stopped. When
she saw that there was even the remotest chance that it might go
further, Lady Germaine’s duty was plain. She should have said firmly,
“Not in my house.” It was not to be supposed, indeed, that she could
stop the course of mutual inclination, prevent Mr Winton from making
love to Lady Jane, or Lady Jane from listening. But what she could, and
indeed ought to, have done, was to say plainly, “Meet where they will,
it must not be in my house.” Her duty to the Duke demanded this course
of action. But it must be confessed that Lady Germaine was very
independent--too independent for a woman--and that what she would not
recognise was, that she had any duty at all to the Duke. He might be the
head of society in the county, but what did Lady Germaine care? She
laughed openly at the county society, and declared that she would as
soon throw in her lot among the farmers of the district as among the
squires, and that the Duke was an old--the pen of the historian almost
refuses to record the language this daring lady used--an old humbug. She
ventured to say this and lived. The Duke never knew how far she went,
but he disapproved of her, and considered her an irreverent person. He
would have checked his daughter’s intimacy with her had he been able.
But the Duchess did not see any harm in it. Her Grace’s opinion was that
a little enlivenment was what Jane wanted, and that even a slight
exaggeration of gaiety would do her no harm. Lady Germaine’s set was
unimpeachable though it loved diversion, and diversion was above
everything the thing necessary for Lady Jane. And there was this to be
said for Lady Germaine, that the Duchess herself had the opportunity of
stopping the Winton affair had she chosen. She must have seen what was
going on. Poor Mr Winton could not conceal the state of mind in which he
was; and as for Lady Jane, there was a certain tremor in her retired and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account