Algorithms; Arithmetic -- Early works to 1900; Mathematics -- History
In a composite treatise containing tracts written A.D. 1157 and 1208, on
the calendar, the abacus, the manual calendar and the manual abacus, we
have a number of the methods preserved. As an example we give the rule
for multiplication (Claud. A. IV., f. 54 vo). “Si numerus multiplicat
alium numerum auferatur differentia majoris a minore, et per residuum
multiplicetur articulus, et una differentia per aliam, et summa
proveniet.” Example, 8 × 7. The difference of 8 is 2, of 7 is 3, the
next article being 10; 7 - 2 is 5. 5 × 10 = 50; 2 × 3 = 6. 50 + 6 = 56
answer. The rule will hold in such cases as 17 × 15 where the article
next higher is the same for both, _i.e._, 20; but in such a case as
17 × 9 the difference for each number must be taken from the higher
article, _i.e._, the difference of 9 will be 11.
THE ALGORISTS.
Algorism (augrim, augrym, algram, agram, algorithm), owes its name to
the accident that the first arithmetical treatise translated from the
Arabic happened to be one written by Al-Khowarazmi in the early ninth
century, “de numeris Indorum,” beginning in its Latin form “Dixit
Algorismi. . . .” The translation, of which only one MS. is known, was
made about 1120 by Adelard of Bath, who also wrote on the Abacus and
translated with a commentary Euclid from the Arabic. It is probable that
another version was made by Gerard of Cremona (1114-1187); the number of
important works that were not translated more than once from the Arabic
decreases every year with our knowledge of medieval texts. A few lines
of this translation, as copied by Halliwell, are given on p. 72, note 2.
Another translation still seems to have been made by Johannes
Hispalensis.
Algorism is distinguished from Abacist computation by recognising seven
rules, Addition, Subtraction, Duplation, Mediation, Multiplication,
Division, and Extraction of Roots, to which were afterwards added
Numeration and Progression. It is further distinguished by the use of
the zero, which enabled the computer to dispense with the columns of the
Abacus. It obviously employs a board with fine sand or wax, and later,
as a substitute, paper or parchment; slate and pencil were also used in
the fourteenth century, how much earlier is unknown.[5*] Algorism
quickly ousted the Abacus methods for all intricate calculations, being
simpler and more easily checked: in fact, the astronomical revival of
the twelfth and thirteenth centuries would have been impossible without
its aid.
[Footnote 5*: Slates are mentioned by Chaucer, and soon after
(1410) Prosdocimo de Beldamandi speaks of the use of a “lapis”
for making notes on by calculators.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account