The early English cotton industryDaniels, George W. (George William)
History
The early English cotton industry
Daniels, George W. (George William)
Cotton machinery; Cotton trade -- Great Britain
Some idea of the extent to which Anthony Mosley was engaged in the
cloth trade may be gathered from the facts that at home he had cloth to
the value of £247, and abroad (evidently in the hands of traders and
finishers) to the value of £224.[123] He had debts owing to him to the
extent of nearly £1300, of which sum £850 had been put into stock “with
Francis Locker by indentures.” To what extent the other portion was
owing for cloth is not clear, but the fact that a debt was owing by a
mercer suggests that some of it was.
[Footnote 123: _Ibid._, p. 15 _et seq._
CLOTH AT HOME AND ABROAD
£ _s._ _d._ £ _s._ _d._
70 pieces of broad At Robt. Bowker’s:
Whites ready dressed 46 broad Whites at
at 45s. a piece 157 10 0 46s. 8d. a piece 107 6 8
38 Graies at 30s. a 34 Graies at 30s. a
piece 57 0 0 piece. 51 0 0
13 Cottons at 32s. a At Roger Nayden’s
piece 20 16 0 Mylne:
1 Black Cotton 1 10 0 30 Graies at 30s. a
12 pieces Rett (?) piece. 45 0 0
canvas 10 10 0 At Wm. Wardleworth’s
Mylne:
6 Cottons and one
Graie. 10 10 0
At Jno. Heywood’s
Mylne:
7 Graies at 30s. a
piece. 10 10 0
------------ ------------
£247 6 0 £224 6 8
]
It is in connection with the Chethams, however, and particularly
with Humphrey Chetham, whose life covered the period from 1580 to
1653,[124] that we get the most valuable information concerning the
organisation of the cloth industry in the Manchester district in the
seventeenth century. Besides Humphrey, three of his brothers were
engaged in “Manchester trade.”[125] In 1597 he was apprenticed to
Mr. Samuel Tipping, a Manchester linendraper, to whom his eldest
brother, James, was also apprenticed, while another brother, George,
was apprenticed to Mr. George Tipping, the younger brother of Samuel,
who again was a “grosser and linen draper.”[126] About 1605 George
and Humphrey Chetham entered into a partnership which was renewed and
continued until the death of the former at the end of 1626, though
after 1619, rather than to extend their mercantile business, they
invested their capital in land.[127]
[Footnote 124: Raines and Sutton, _Life of Humphrey Chetham_, Chetham
Society, N.S., vol. xlix.]
[Footnote 125: _Ibid._, pp. 8-11.]
[Footnote 126: _Ibid._, p. 11.]
[Footnote 127: _Ibid._, pp. 12, 21-22.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account