The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
It is a commonplace of Biblical students that numbers are peculiarly
liable to corruption, and that consequently little dependence can be
placed on the numbers given in the text of the Old Testament. But the
conclusion does not follow from the premiss. The later dates of
Israelitish history are for the most part reliable, and it would be
strange if the causes of corruption were fatal only to the dates of an
earlier period. Moreover, the numbers fit into a self-consistent system,
the several fractions of which agree with the whole summation. Such a
self-consistent system would perhaps demand acceptance were it not that
there are three such systems, rivals one of the other, and mutually
incompatible. One is that of the Massoretic Hebrew text, which makes the
period from the Creation to the call of Abraham exactly 2000 solar years
(or, 2056 lunar years), 1600 of which extend from the Creation to the
Deluge, and the remaining 400 from the Deluge to the call of Abraham. A
second is that of the Septuagint, according to which the period from the
Creation to the Flood is 2200 solar years (or, 2262 lunar years), 1600
of these elapsing between the Creation and the birth of Noah, and 600
from that event to the Flood, while 1200 are counted from the Flood to
the call of the patriarch. The third is that of the Samaritan text which
divides the period into two halves of 1200 years each; the first 1200
comprising the time from the Creation to the birth of the sons of Noah,
and the second 1200 the rest of the period.
It is obvious that all these systems are like the similar chronological
systems of the Egyptians, the Babylonians, or the Hindus, mere
artificial schemes of an astronomical character, and differing from the
latter only in their more modest computation of time. For historical
purposes they are worthless, and indicate merely that materials for a
chronology were entirely wanting. The ages assigned to the patriarchs
before the Flood, for example, stand on a level with the reigns of the
ten antediluvian kings of Chaldæa which are extended over 120 sari, or
432,000 years. The post-diluvian patriarchs are in no better position;
indeed, one of them, Arphaxad, is a geographical title, and the
Septuagint interpolates after him a certain Kainan, of whom neither the
Hebrew nor the Samaritan text knows anything.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account