The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
The embassy of the representatives of Israel was followed by severer
measures of repression. It indicated a rising spirit of rebellion, a
desire to return to the old free life of the desert, and to be quit for
ever of Egyptian burdens. Strikes were not unknown among the free
workmen of Thebes; but a strike among the royal slaves was a more
serious matter, and seemed to prove that the Bedâwi spirit of
independence and insubordination was still active among the settlers in
Goshen.[167] The Israelites were still employed in building cities and
fortresses, and they were now bidden to find for themselves the _tibn_
or chopped straw, which they mixed with the clay of the bricks, and, at
the same time, to deliver the same number of bricks as before. The
_tibn_ was employed, as it still is, for binding the clay more closely
together, but it is not essential, and many of the ancient bricks of
Egypt, more especially those used in Upper Egypt, are made without it.
In the Delta, however, with its damper climate, the _tibn_ was more
necessary, and the Egyptian taskmasters, accordingly, required it, or
else some substitute for it.[168] The condition of the Israelites thus
became intolerable; they were scattered over the land, seeking for
‘stubble instead of straw,’ and beaten mercilessly in traditional
Egyptian fashion if the full tale of bricks was not delivered. The
‘stubble’ corresponded with the dry stalks of the durra, which are still
sometimes used for a similar purpose, and was obtained from the beds of
dry reeds which lined the marshes in the Eastern Delta.
Once more Moses and Aaron appeared before the Pharaoh, this time
prepared to enforce their petition by signs and wonders. That they
should have had such ready access to the sovereign may seem strange to
the Western mind. But it is in full accordance with the traditions of
the Egyptian court, which have been maintained down to the reign of the
late Khedive. The ruler of the country was accessible to all who had a
complaint to make before him, or a petition to offer. _Bakshish_ might
be needful before the charmed circle of officials by which he was
surrounded could be broken through; but once it was broken, he was bound
to give audience to whosoever came to him. Moses and Aaron, moreover,
were the delegates and representatives of their people, and as such had
a right to be heard. The system they represented is still in full force
in modern Egypt. Each class of the community, each religion, each trade,
each nationality, has its recognised representative or ‘shêkh,’ who
stands between it and the government, and acts on its behalf in all
political and legal matters. He is as much its representative as an
ambassador or consul is the representative of the nation which has
accredited him, and the rights and privileges which belong to an
ambassador belong also to the ‘shêkh.’ The Pharaoh could not exclude
Moses and Aaron from his presence, even though the people they
represented were public slaves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account