The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
But what is ‘the sea,’ by the side of which the Israelites encamped? Its
identification has been the subject of much controversy—a fact, however,
which ceases to astonish us when we find that the Hebrew writers
themselves were uncertain about it. While in the narrative of the Exodus
‘the sea’ crossed by the Israelites is carefully distinguished from the
‘Yâm Sûph’ or ‘Reedy Sea,’ at which they subsequently arrived, there are
other passages in the Old Testament, more especially of a poetical
nature, in which the two seas are confounded together. Two
irreconcileable systems of geography are thus presented to us which have
hitherto made the geography of the Exodus an insoluble problem.
In the narrative, however, all is clear and exact. The children of
Israel, it was determined, instead of following the northern road to
Palestine, should march along that which led to ‘the wilderness of the
Yâm Sûph.’ But between them and this wilderness lay the Egyptian wall of
fortification, which extended from the marshes in the north to the Gulf
of Suez, or its prolongation, in the south. It was only when they had
turned the southern end of the wall by crossing ‘the sea’ that they
entered ‘the wilderness of the wall,’ where they wandered for three days
without finding water (Exod. xv. 22). Later they came to the palm-grove
of Elim, and then after that to the Yâm Sûph (Numb. xxxiii. 10).
The Yâm Sûph was well known to Hebrew geography, and corresponded with
the modern Gulf of Aqaba. It was upon the Yâm Sûph, at Elath and
Ezion-geber, ‘in the land of Edom,’ that Solomon built his ships (1
Kings ix. 26); and after the capture of Arad, in the extreme south of
Canaan, the Israelites marched ‘from mount Hor by the way of Yâm Sûph,
in order to compass the land of Edom’ (Numb. xxi. 4). Elim is but
another form of Elath, the ruins of which lie close to Aqaba, while the
town of Sûph lay ‘over against’ the wilderness in the plains of Moab
(Deut. i. 1). The Yâm Sûph, in fact, so erroneously rendered ‘the Red
Sea’ in the Authorised Version, was the Gulf of Aqaba. The sister Gulf
of Suez was called by the Hebrews ‘the Egyptian Sea’ (Isa. xi. 15), a
very appropriate name, since it was enclosed on either side by Egyptian
territory. From the days of the third dynasty to those of the Ptolemies,
Mafkat, the Sinaitic peninsula, was included among the provinces of
Egypt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account